HomeCompareKorn Ferry vs TalentLens

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Korn Ferry vs TalentLens

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

Korn Ferry and TalentLens tie at 46.

Korn Ferry and TalentLens tie at 46 under rubric v1.0 inside the Assessment cohort, arriving there from different criteria. Korn Ferry leads 4 of the 7 criteria and TalentLens 3, yet the two totals land on the same number. One criterion, Article 11 Technical Documentation, is both the widest raw gap (Korn Ferry 58, TalentLens 52) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 20% weight it makes up 56% of the weighted advantage Korn Ferry holds across the 4 criteria it leads.

§ The record

Korn Ferry and TalentLens are both filed under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.

RecordKorn FerryTalentLens
Price tierEnterpriseMid
HeadquartersUSGB
Founded1969Not recorded

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 30% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Korn Ferry 58 · TalentLens 52

    1.2 weighted points to Korn Ferry

  2. 15% weight · 49% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Korn Ferry 25 · TalentLens 30

    0.8 weighted points to TalentLens

  3. 12% weight · 64% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Korn Ferry 52 · TalentLens 57

    0.6 weighted points to TalentLens

  4. 18% weight · 77% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Korn Ferry 48 · TalentLens 45

    0.5 weighted points to Korn Ferry

  5. 8% weight · 89% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Korn Ferry 52 · TalentLens 58

    0.5 weighted points to TalentLens

  6. 15% weight · 97% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Korn Ferry 52 · TalentLens 50

    0.3 weighted points to Korn Ferry

  7. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Korn Ferry 33 · TalentLens 32

    0.1 weighted points to Korn Ferry

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +0.3 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 4.0 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads 0 beside that +0.3.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Korn Ferry minus TalentLens.

CategoryWeightKorn FerryTalentLensΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%5852+6+1.2
Bias Audit Transparency18%4845+3+0.5
FRIA Support15%2530-5-0.8
Data Governance Disclosure15%5250+2+0.3
Human Oversight Design12%5257-5-0.6
Post-Market Monitoring12%3332+1+0.1
Customer Documentation8%5258-6-0.5
Total100%46 (F)46 (F)-+0.3

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightKorn FerryTalentLens
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%21Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%11Sources on the vendor's own domain31Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%01—21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%21Sources on the vendor's own domain40Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%21Sources on the vendor's own domain40Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%11Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Customer Documentation8%21Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%107Sources on the vendor's own domain245Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Korn Ferry has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 10 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; TalentLens has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 24 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for TalentLens sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 46 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 17 for Korn Ferry, across 1 distinct source domain, and 29 for TalentLens, across 3 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Korn Ferry last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
TalentLens last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.