HomeCompareKorn Ferry vs Talview

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Korn Ferry vs Talview

Export comparison (CSV)Pro

§ The result

4 points separate Korn Ferry and Talview.

Korn Ferry (Assessment) edges Talview (Video interview) by 4 points under rubric v1.0, 46 to 42. Korn Ferry leads 4 of the 7 criteria, including Bias Audit Transparency, while Talview leads 1, including Human Oversight Design, and 2 are level. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Korn Ferry 48, Talview 38 — and at an 18% weight it carries 44% of the weighted advantage Korn Ferry holds across the 4 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Korn Ferry is filed under Assessment AI, Talview under Video interview AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.

RecordKorn FerryTalview
Price tierEnterpriseEnterprise
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded19692012

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 40% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Korn Ferry 48 · Talview 38

    1.8 weighted points to Korn Ferry

  2. 20% weight · 76% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Korn Ferry 58 · Talview 50

    1.6 weighted points to Korn Ferry

  3. 15% weight · 89% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Korn Ferry 52 · Talview 48

    0.6 weighted points to Korn Ferry

  4. 12% weight · 97% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Korn Ferry 52 · Talview 55

    0.4 weighted points to Talview

  5. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Korn Ferry 33 · Talview 32

    0.1 weighted points to Korn Ferry

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 5 figures above sum to +3.8 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 4.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +4 beside that +3.8.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Korn Ferry minus Talview.

CategoryWeightKorn FerryTalviewΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%5850+8+1.6
Bias Audit Transparency18%4838+10+1.8
FRIA Support15%2525--
Data Governance Disclosure15%5248+4+0.6
Human Oversight Design12%5255-3-0.4
Post-Market Monitoring12%3332+1+0.1
Customer Documentation8%5252--
Total100%46 (F)42 (F)+4+3.8

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightKorn FerryTalview
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%21Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%11Sources on the vendor's own domain11
FRIA Support15%0101
Data Governance Disclosure15%21Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%21Sources on the vendor's own domain20Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%11Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%21Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%107Sources on the vendor's own domain116Sources on the vendor's own domain

Korn Ferry has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 10 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Talview has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 6 documented absences.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 34 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 17 for Korn Ferry, across 1 distinct source domain, and 17 for Talview, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
Korn Ferry last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Talview last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.