§ The result
3 points separate LandEarly and Rezi.
LandEarly (Auto-apply) edges Rezi (Resume AI) by 3 points under rubric js-v1.0, 62 (D) to 59 (F). LandEarly leads 5 of the 7 criteria, including Application Honesty, while Rezi leads 2, including Support & Accountability. The widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing fall on different criteria: Support & Accountability (LandEarly 44, Rezi 70) and Application Honesty at 20% (LandEarly 68, Rezi 55), the second being 38% of the weighted advantage LandEarly holds across the 5 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
LandEarly
LandEarly is an AI auto-apply platform that monitors job boards, generates role-tailored resumes and cover letters from a job seeker's real history, and submits applications through supported applicant tracking systems, with a review-before-submit step and an optional autopilot mode.
Vendor profile
Rezi
Rezi is an AI resume builder that drafts and rewrites resume bullet points, summaries and cover letters, scores drafts against ATS formatting conventions with a 0-100 "Rezi Score", and adds a Chrome extension that autofills job applications on Workday, Greenhouse and Lever for the user to submit.
§ The record
LandEarly is filed under Auto-apply tools, Rezi under Resume & profile AI. They also share 3 secondary categories: Tracker, Career coaching and Job matching.
| Record | LandEarly | Rezi |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | KR |
| Founded | 2026 | 2015 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 26% of the movement so far
Application Honesty
LandEarly 68 · Rezi 55
2.6 weighted points to LandEarly
12% weight · 47% of the movement so far
Effectiveness Evidence
LandEarly 50 · Rezi 32
2.2 weighted points to LandEarly
8% weight · 68% of the movement so far
Support & Accountability
LandEarly 44 · Rezi 70
2.1 weighted points to Rezi
20% weight · 84% of the movement so far
Data & Credential Safety
LandEarly 66 · Rezi 58
1.6 weighted points to LandEarly
15% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Employer & ATS Legitimacy
LandEarly 60 · Rezi 68
1.2 weighted points to Rezi
15% weight · 99% of the movement so far
User Control & Transparency
LandEarly 72 · Rezi 70
0.3 weighted points to LandEarly
10% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Pricing & Cancellation Fairness
LandEarly 63 · Rezi 62
0.1 weighted points to LandEarly
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +3.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 10.0 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +3 beside that +3.5.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is LandEarly minus Rezi.
| Category | Weight | LandEarly | Rezi | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Application Honesty | 20% | 68 | 55 | +13 | +2.6 |
| Data & Credential Safety | 20% | 66 | 58 | +8 | +1.6 |
| User Control & Transparency | 15% | 72 | 70 | +2 | +0.3 |
| Employer & ATS Legitimacy | 15% | 60 | 68 | -8 | -1.2 |
| Effectiveness Evidence | 12% | 50 | 32 | +18 | +2.2 |
| Pricing & Cancellation Fairness | 10% | 63 | 62 | +1 | +0.1 |
| Support & Accountability | 8% | 44 | 70 | -26 | -2.1 |
| Total | 100% | 62 (D) | 59 (F) | +3 | +3.5 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | LandEarly | Rezi | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Application Honesty | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data & Credential Safety | 20% | 0 | 1 | — | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| User Control & Transparency | 15% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Employer & ATS Legitimacy | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Effectiveness Evidence | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 4 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Pricing & Cancellation Fairness | 10% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Support & Accountability | 8% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 10 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 27 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
LandEarly has 16 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 10 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Rezi has 34 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 27 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Rezi sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 50 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 16 for LandEarly, across 1 distinct source domain, and 34 for Rezi, across 6 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- js-v1.0
- LandEarly last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Rezi last reviewed
- September 4, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next
The full profiles
Scored against