HomeCompareLinkedIn Recruiter vs Pulsifi

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

LinkedIn Recruiter vs Pulsifi

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

LinkedIn Recruiter leads Pulsifi on all 7 criteria.

Under rubric v1.0, LinkedIn Recruiter (Sourcing) opens a 24-point lead on Pulsifi (Assessment), 57 to 33. Pulsifi leads none of the 7 criteria, and LinkedIn Recruiter is ahead on 5 of them by 20 raw points or more, Article 11 Technical Documentation among them. Even Article 11 Technical Documentation, the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (LinkedIn Recruiter 67, Pulsifi 30, 20% weight), is only 31% of the weighted advantage LinkedIn Recruiter builds across the 7 criteria it leads.

§ The record

LinkedIn Recruiter is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Pulsifi under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Illinois HB 3773. Only Pulsifi is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordLinkedIn RecruiterPulsifi
Price tierEnterpriseMid
HeadquartersUSSG
Founded20022017

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 31% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    LinkedIn Recruiter 67 · Pulsifi 30

    7.4 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  2. 18% weight · 54% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    LinkedIn Recruiter 50 · Pulsifi 20

    5.4 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  3. 15% weight · 68% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    LinkedIn Recruiter 62 · Pulsifi 40

    3.3 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  4. 12% weight · 79% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    LinkedIn Recruiter 50 · Pulsifi 28

    2.6 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  5. 15% weight · 87% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    LinkedIn Recruiter 38 · Pulsifi 25

    1.9 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  6. 8% weight · 94% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    LinkedIn Recruiter 68 · Pulsifi 46

    1.8 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  7. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    LinkedIn Recruiter 66 · Pulsifi 55

    1.3 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +23.8 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 23.8 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +24 beside that +23.8.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is LinkedIn Recruiter minus Pulsifi.

CategoryWeightLinkedIn RecruiterPulsifiΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%6730+37+7.4
Bias Audit Transparency18%5020+30+5.4
FRIA Support15%3825+13+1.9
Data Governance Disclosure15%6240+22+3.3
Human Oversight Design12%6655+11+1.3
Post-Market Monitoring12%5028+22+2.6
Customer Documentation8%6846+22+1.8
Total100%57 (F)33 (F)+24+23.8

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightLinkedIn RecruiterPulsifi
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%41Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain31—
FRIA Support15%31Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%50Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain60Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%60Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain51Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%61Sources on the vendor's own domain32Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%61Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain51Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%345Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain267Sources on the vendor's own domain

LinkedIn Recruiter has 39 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 34 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Pulsifi has 33 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 26 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for LinkedIn Recruiter sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 72 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 39 for LinkedIn Recruiter, across 6 distinct source domains, and 33 for Pulsifi, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
LinkedIn Recruiter last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Pulsifi last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.