HomeCompareLinkedIn Recruiter vs Willo

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

LinkedIn Recruiter vs Willo

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

LinkedIn Recruiter leads Willo on all 7 criteria.

LinkedIn Recruiter finishes 16 points clear of Willo under rubric v1.0 — 57 against 41 — across the Sourcing and Video interview cohorts. Of the 7 criteria Willo wins none, and the narrowest lead LinkedIn Recruiter holds is on Human Oversight Design, LinkedIn Recruiter 66 to Willo 62. Even Article 11 Technical Documentation, the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (LinkedIn Recruiter 67, Willo 38, 20% weight), is only 36% of the weighted advantage LinkedIn Recruiter builds across the 7 criteria it leads.

§ The record

LinkedIn Recruiter is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Willo under Video interview AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Illinois HB 3773. Only Willo is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordLinkedIn RecruiterWillo
Price tierEnterpriseLow
HeadquartersUSGB
Founded20022018

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 36% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    LinkedIn Recruiter 67 · Willo 38

    5.8 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  2. 18% weight · 59% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    LinkedIn Recruiter 50 · Willo 30

    3.6 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  3. 15% weight · 71% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    LinkedIn Recruiter 38 · Willo 25

    1.9 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  4. 12% weight · 82% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    LinkedIn Recruiter 50 · Willo 36

    1.7 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  5. 15% weight · 90% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    LinkedIn Recruiter 62 · Willo 53

    1.3 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  6. 8% weight · 97% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    LinkedIn Recruiter 68 · Willo 54

    1.1 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  7. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    LinkedIn Recruiter 66 · Willo 62

    0.5 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +16.0 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 16.0 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +16 beside that +16.0.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is LinkedIn Recruiter minus Willo.

CategoryWeightLinkedIn RecruiterWilloΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%6738+29+5.8
Bias Audit Transparency18%5030+20+3.6
FRIA Support15%3825+13+1.9
Data Governance Disclosure15%6253+9+1.3
Human Oversight Design12%6662+4+0.5
Post-Market Monitoring12%5036+14+1.7
Customer Documentation8%6854+14+1.1
Total100%57 (F)41 (F)+16+16.0

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightLinkedIn RecruiterWillo
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%41Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain11—
FRIA Support15%31Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain01—
Data Governance Disclosure15%50Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain20Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%60Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain20Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%61Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%61Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%345Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain95Sources on the vendor's own domain

LinkedIn Recruiter has 39 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 34 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Willo has 14 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for LinkedIn Recruiter sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 53 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 39 for LinkedIn Recruiter, across 6 distinct source domains, and 14 for Willo, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
LinkedIn Recruiter last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Willo last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.