HomeCompareLoxo vs Pulsifi

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Loxo vs Pulsifi

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

4 points separate Loxo and Pulsifi.

Loxo holds a 4-point edge over Pulsifi under rubric v1.0, 37 to 33, across the Sourcing and Assessment cohorts. The 7 criteria split 4 to 1 in favour of Loxo, with 2 level: Loxo is ahead on Data Governance Disclosure and Pulsifi on Human Oversight Design. The widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing fall on different criteria: Post-Market Monitoring (Loxo 40, Pulsifi 28) and Data Governance Disclosure at 15% (Loxo 50, Pulsifi 40), the second being 32% of the weighted advantage Loxo holds across the 4 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Loxo is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Pulsifi under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: ATS-integrated.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and NYC LL 144. Only Pulsifi is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.

RecordLoxoPulsifi
Price tierMidMid
HeadquartersUSSG
Founded20122017

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 15% weight · 29% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Loxo 50 · Pulsifi 40

    1.5 weighted points to Loxo

  2. 12% weight · 56% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Loxo 40 · Pulsifi 28

    1.4 weighted points to Loxo

  3. 8% weight · 74% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Loxo 58 · Pulsifi 46

    1.0 weighted points to Loxo

  4. 15% weight · 89% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Loxo 30 · Pulsifi 25

    0.8 weighted points to Loxo

  5. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Loxo 50 · Pulsifi 55

    0.6 weighted points to Pulsifi

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 5 figures above sum to +4.0 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 5.3 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +4 beside that +4.0.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Loxo minus Pulsifi.

CategoryWeightLoxoPulsifiΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%3030--
Bias Audit Transparency18%2020--
FRIA Support15%3025+5+0.8
Data Governance Disclosure15%5040+10+1.5
Human Oversight Design12%5055-5-0.6
Post-Market Monitoring12%4028+12+1.4
Customer Documentation8%5846+12+1.0
Total100%37 (F)33 (F)+4+4.0

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightLoxoPulsifi
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%21Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%11—31—
FRIA Support15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%31Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain60Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%11—51Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%21Sources on the vendor's own domain32Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%21Sources on the vendor's own domain51Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%127Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain267Sources on the vendor's own domain

Loxo has 19 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Pulsifi has 33 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 26 with a source URL, 7 documented absences.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 52 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 19 for Loxo, across 1 distinct source domain, and 33 for Pulsifi, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
Loxo last reviewed
July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Pulsifi last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.