§ The result
Pulsifi leads Moonhub on 4 of the 7 criteria.
Pulsifi holds a 3-point edge over Moonhub under rubric v1.0, 33 to 30, across the Assessment and Sourcing cohorts. Moonhub is ahead on none of the 7 criteria: Pulsifi takes 4, the remaining 3 are level, and the nearest of those 4 is Bias Audit Transparency, Moonhub 18 to Pulsifi 20. The widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing fall on different criteria: Customer Documentation (Moonhub 38, Pulsifi 46) and Human Oversight Design at 12% (Moonhub 48, Pulsifi 55), the second being 33% of the weighted advantage Pulsifi holds across the 4 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Moonhub
Moonhub is an AI recruiting platform whose agents (Qualify AI, Engage AI, Monitor AI) search, score, outreach to, and engage candidates across more than a billion public and proprietary profiles, working alongside human expert recruiters who vet candidates before presenting them.
Vendor profile
Pulsifi
Pulsifi gives candidates and employees 0-100 Role Fit and Organizational Fit scores that combine personality, work-interest, work-culture and cognitive assessments with AI resume and skills analysis, and uses the scores to rank people for hiring, internal mobility and succession.
§ The record
Moonhub is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Pulsifi under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Illinois HB 3773. Only Pulsifi is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Moonhub | Pulsifi |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | SG |
| Founded | 2022 | 2017 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
12% weight · 33% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Moonhub 48 · Pulsifi 55
0.8 weighted points to Pulsifi
12% weight · 61% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Moonhub 22 · Pulsifi 28
0.7 weighted points to Pulsifi
8% weight · 86% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Moonhub 38 · Pulsifi 46
0.6 weighted points to Pulsifi
18% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Moonhub 18 · Pulsifi 20
0.4 weighted points to Pulsifi
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 4 figures above sum to -2.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 2.6 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -3 beside that -2.6.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Moonhub minus Pulsifi.
| Category | Weight | Moonhub | Pulsifi | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 30 | 30 | - | - |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 18 | 20 | -2 | -0.4 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 25 | - | - |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 40 | 40 | - | - |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 48 | 55 | -7 | -0.8 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 22 | 28 | -6 | -0.7 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 38 | 46 | -8 | -0.6 |
| Total | 100% | 30 (F) | 33 (F) | -3 | -2.6 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Moonhub | Pulsifi | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | — | 3 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 0 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 3 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 6 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 26 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Moonhub has 13 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 6 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Pulsifi has 33 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 26 with a source URL, 7 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 46 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 13 for Moonhub, across 3 distinct source domains, and 33 for Pulsifi, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Moonhub last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Pulsifi last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next