§ The result
Talview leads Moonhub on 6 of the 7 criteria.
Talview sits 12 points above Moonhub under rubric v1.0 — 42 against 30 — with Talview filed under Video interview and Moonhub under Sourcing. Talview leads 6 of the 7 criteria and the remaining criterion is level, so Moonhub is ahead on none of them; the closest of the 6 Talview leads is Human Oversight Design, Moonhub 48 to Talview 55. Article 11 Technical Documentation is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (Moonhub 30, Talview 50, 20% weight), but it accounts for only 33% of the weighted advantage Talview holds across the 6 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Moonhub
Moonhub is an AI recruiting platform whose agents (Qualify AI, Engage AI, Monitor AI) search, score, outreach to, and engage candidates across more than a billion public and proprietary profiles, working alongside human expert recruiters who vet candidates before presenting them.
Vendor profile
Talview
AI-powered hiring and exam-integrity platform spanning video interviewing, skills assessments, identity verification, and AI proctoring.
§ The record
Moonhub is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Talview under Video interview AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Illinois HB 3773. Only Talview is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Moonhub | Talview |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2022 | 2012 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 33% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Moonhub 30 · Talview 50
4.0 weighted points to Talview
18% weight · 64% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Moonhub 18 · Talview 38
3.6 weighted points to Talview
15% weight · 74% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Moonhub 40 · Talview 48
1.2 weighted points to Talview
12% weight · 84% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Moonhub 22 · Talview 32
1.2 weighted points to Talview
8% weight · 93% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Moonhub 38 · Talview 52
1.1 weighted points to Talview
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Moonhub 48 · Talview 55
0.8 weighted points to Talview
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to -12.0 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 12.0 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -12 beside that -12.0.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Moonhub minus Talview.
| Category | Weight | Moonhub | Talview | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 30 | 50 | -20 | -4.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 18 | 38 | -20 | -3.6 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 25 | - | - |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 40 | 48 | -8 | -1.2 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 48 | 55 | -7 | -0.8 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 22 | 32 | -10 | -1.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 38 | 52 | -14 | -1.1 |
| Total | 100% | 30 (F) | 42 (F) | -12 | -12.0 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Moonhub | Talview | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 0 | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 6 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 11 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Moonhub has 13 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 6 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Talview has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 6 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 30 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 13 for Moonhub, across 3 distinct source domains, and 17 for Talview, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Moonhub last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Talview last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next