§ The result
TestDome leads Moonhub by 7 points.
TestDome scores 37 and Moonhub 30 under rubric v1.0, a 7-point gap across the Assessment and Sourcing cohorts. TestDome leads 6 of the 7 criteria, including Article 11 Technical Documentation, while Moonhub leads 1, including Bias Audit Transparency. Customer Documentation is the widest raw gap (Moonhub 38, TestDome 60) but not the heaviest weighted swing, which is Article 11 Technical Documentation at 20% (Moonhub 30, TestDome 40), 28% of the weighted advantage TestDome builds across the 6 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Moonhub
Moonhub is an AI recruiting platform whose agents (Qualify AI, Engage AI, Monitor AI) search, score, outreach to, and engage candidates across more than a billion public and proprietary profiles, working alongside human expert recruiters who vet candidates before presenting them.
Vendor profile
TestDome
TestDome sells pay-per-candidate online skills tests for coding, Excel and more than 100 other skills. The tests are scored automatically, and open-ended answers can be scored by AI. AI analysis of webcam and screen proctoring recordings flags possible cheating, and a live code-interview tool is included.
§ The record
Moonhub is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, TestDome under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Illinois HB 3773. Only TestDome is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Moonhub | TestDome |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Low |
| Headquarters | US | HR |
| Founded | 2022 | 2013 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 26% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Moonhub 30 · TestDome 40
2.0 weighted points to TestDome
8% weight · 49% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Moonhub 38 · TestDome 60
1.8 weighted points to TestDome
15% weight · 68% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Moonhub 40 · TestDome 50
1.5 weighted points to TestDome
12% weight · 81% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Moonhub 22 · TestDome 30
1.0 weighted points to TestDome
18% weight · 88% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Moonhub 18 · TestDome 15
0.5 weighted points to Moonhub
12% weight · 94% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Moonhub 48 · TestDome 52
0.5 weighted points to TestDome
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Moonhub 25 · TestDome 28
0.4 weighted points to TestDome
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -6.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 7.7 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -7 beside that -6.6.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Moonhub minus TestDome.
| Category | Weight | Moonhub | TestDome | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 30 | 40 | -10 | -2.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 18 | 15 | +3 | +0.5 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 28 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 40 | 50 | -10 | -1.5 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 48 | 52 | -4 | -0.5 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 22 | 30 | -8 | -1.0 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 38 | 60 | -22 | -1.8 |
| Total | 100% | 30 (F) | 37 (F) | -7 | -6.6 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Moonhub | TestDome | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | — | 3 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 0 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 6 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 27 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Moonhub has 13 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 6 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; TestDome has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 27 with a source URL, 5 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 44 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 13 for Moonhub, across 3 distinct source domains, and 31 for TestDome, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Moonhub last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- TestDome last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next