§ The result
Paradox leads myInterview on 6 of the 7 criteria.
Paradox (Scheduling) edges myInterview (Video interview) by 4 points under rubric v1.0, 41 to 37. Paradox leads 6 of the 7 criteria and the remaining criterion is level, so myInterview is ahead on none of them; the closest of the 6 Paradox leads is Article 11 Technical Documentation, myInterview 38 to Paradox 40. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — myInterview 35, Paradox 50 — and at an 18% weight it carries 61% of the weighted advantage Paradox holds across the 6 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
myInterview
myInterview is an asynchronous one-way video interview platform that records candidate video responses and applies AI-assisted "Smart Shortlisting" and Big Five-based personality insights to help recruiters screen and rank applicants.
Vendor profile
Paradox
Conversational AI ("Olivia") that screens, schedules, and engages candidates over chat and SMS, often deployed on top of an existing ATS.
§ The record
myInterview is filed under Video interview AI, Paradox under Scheduling AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Illinois HB 3773 and Colorado AI Act. Only myInterview is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | myInterview | Paradox |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | AU | US |
| Founded | 2014 | 2016 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 61% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
myInterview 35 · Paradox 50
2.7 weighted points to Paradox
15% weight · 71% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
myInterview 42 · Paradox 45
0.4 weighted points to Paradox
20% weight · 80% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
myInterview 38 · Paradox 40
0.4 weighted points to Paradox
8% weight · 89% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
myInterview 40 · Paradox 45
0.4 weighted points to Paradox
12% weight · 95% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
myInterview 48 · Paradox 50
0.2 weighted points to Paradox
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
myInterview 33 · Paradox 35
0.2 weighted points to Paradox
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to -4.4 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 4.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -4 beside that -4.4.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is myInterview minus Paradox.
| Category | Weight | myInterview | Paradox | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 38 | 40 | -2 | -0.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 35 | 50 | -15 | -2.7 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 25 | - | - |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 42 | 45 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 48 | 50 | -2 | -0.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 33 | 35 | -2 | -0.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 40 | 45 | -5 | -0.4 |
| Total | 100% | 37 (F) | 41 (F) | -4 | -4.4 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | myInterview | Paradox | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | — | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 0 | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 1 | 0 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 7 | 6 | Sources on a separate domain | 8 | 2 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
myInterview has 13 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 7 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Paradox has 10 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 8 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for myInterview and Paradox sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 23 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 13 for myInterview, across 2 distinct source domains, and 10 for Paradox, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- myInterview last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Paradox last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next