§ The result
RippleMatch leads myInterview on all 7 criteria.
Under rubric v1.0, RippleMatch, filed under Sourcing, finishes on 46 and myInterview, filed under Video interview, on 37, 9 points apart. Of the 7 criteria myInterview wins none, and the narrowest lead RippleMatch holds is on FRIA Support, myInterview 25 to RippleMatch 27. The widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing fall on different criteria: Customer Documentation (myInterview 40, RippleMatch 60) and Bias Audit Transparency at 18% (myInterview 35, RippleMatch 53), the second being 34% of the weighted advantage RippleMatch holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
myInterview
myInterview is an asynchronous one-way video interview platform that records candidate video responses and applies AI-assisted "Smart Shortlisting" and Big Five-based personality insights to help recruiters screen and rank applicants.
Vendor profile
RippleMatch
RippleMatch is an early-career recruiting platform that sources students and recent graduates for employers' roles, ranks applicants with a 0-100 Fit Score built from criteria the recruiter configures, and adds verified skill badges, applicant review, interview scheduling and campus-event tools.
§ The record
myInterview is filed under Video interview AI, RippleMatch under Candidate sourcing AI. They also share 2 secondary categories: Screening and Scheduling.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Illinois HB 3773 and Colorado AI Act. Only myInterview is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | myInterview | RippleMatch |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | AU | US |
| Founded | 2014 | 2016 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 34% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
myInterview 35 · RippleMatch 53
3.2 weighted points to RippleMatch
20% weight · 51% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
myInterview 38 · RippleMatch 46
1.6 weighted points to RippleMatch
8% weight · 68% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
myInterview 40 · RippleMatch 60
1.6 weighted points to RippleMatch
15% weight · 80% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
myInterview 42 · RippleMatch 50
1.2 weighted points to RippleMatch
12% weight · 92% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
myInterview 48 · RippleMatch 57
1.1 weighted points to RippleMatch
12% weight · 97% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
myInterview 33 · RippleMatch 37
0.5 weighted points to RippleMatch
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
myInterview 25 · RippleMatch 27
0.3 weighted points to RippleMatch
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -9.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 9.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -9 beside that -9.5.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is myInterview minus RippleMatch.
| Category | Weight | myInterview | RippleMatch | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 38 | 46 | -8 | -1.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 35 | 53 | -18 | -3.2 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 27 | -2 | -0.3 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 42 | 50 | -8 | -1.2 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 48 | 57 | -9 | -1.1 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 33 | 37 | -4 | -0.5 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 40 | 60 | -20 | -1.6 |
| Total | 100% | 37 (F) | 46 (F) | -9 | -9.5 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | myInterview | RippleMatch | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 1 | 1 | — | 7 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | — | 5 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 0 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain | 7 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 7 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 7 | 6 | Sources on a separate domain | 35 | 7 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
myInterview has 13 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 7 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; RippleMatch has 42 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 35 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for myInterview and RippleMatch sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 55 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 13 for myInterview, across 2 distinct source domains, and 42 for RippleMatch, across 5 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- myInterview last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- RippleMatch last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next