§ The result
Sapia.ai leads myInterview on all 7 criteria.
Sapia.ai finishes 19 points clear of myInterview under rubric v1.0 — 56 against 37 — across the Assessment and Video interview cohorts. Sapia.ai leads every one of the 7 criteria and 3 of them by 20 raw points or more, Article 11 Technical Documentation among them; myInterview leads none. Article 11 Technical Documentation is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (myInterview 38, Sapia.ai 70, 20% weight), but it accounts for only 33% of the weighted advantage Sapia.ai holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
myInterview
myInterview is an asynchronous one-way video interview platform that records candidate video responses and applies AI-assisted "Smart Shortlisting" and Big Five-based personality insights to help recruiters screen and rank applicants.
Vendor profile
Sapia.ai
Structured, text-based chat interview that scores candidates on personality (HEXACO) and competency traits - with no video, audio, or demographic data used.
§ The record
myInterview is filed under Video interview AI, Sapia.ai under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Illinois HB 3773, Mobley v. Workday and Colorado AI Act.
| Record | myInterview | Sapia.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | AU | AU |
| Founded | 2014 | 2013 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 33% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
myInterview 38 · Sapia.ai 70
6.4 weighted points to Sapia.ai
18% weight · 49% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
myInterview 35 · Sapia.ai 52
3.1 weighted points to Sapia.ai
15% weight · 64% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
myInterview 42 · Sapia.ai 62
3.0 weighted points to Sapia.ai
12% weight · 75% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
myInterview 33 · Sapia.ai 50
2.0 weighted points to Sapia.ai
8% weight · 84% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
myInterview 40 · Sapia.ai 62
1.8 weighted points to Sapia.ai
12% weight · 92% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
myInterview 48 · Sapia.ai 62
1.7 weighted points to Sapia.ai
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
myInterview 25 · Sapia.ai 35
1.5 weighted points to Sapia.ai
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -19.4 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 19.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -19 beside that -19.4.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is myInterview minus Sapia.ai.
| Category | Weight | myInterview | Sapia.ai | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 38 | 70 | -32 | -6.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 35 | 52 | -17 | -3.1 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 35 | -10 | -1.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 42 | 62 | -20 | -3.0 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 48 | 62 | -14 | -1.7 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 33 | 50 | -17 | -2.0 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 40 | 62 | -22 | -1.8 |
| Total | 100% | 37 (F) | 56 (F) | -19 | -19.4 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | myInterview | Sapia.ai | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 1 | 1 | — | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | — | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 0 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 7 | 6 | Sources on a separate domain | 16 | 4 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
myInterview has 13 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 7 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Sapia.ai has 20 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 16 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for myInterview and Sapia.ai sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 33 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 13 for myInterview, across 2 distinct source domains, and 20 for Sapia.ai, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- myInterview last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Sapia.ai last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next