HomeComparemyInterview vs TalentLens

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

myInterview vs TalentLens

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

TalentLens leads myInterview by 9 points.

TalentLens scores 46 and myInterview 37 under rubric v1.0, a 9-point gap across the Assessment and Video interview cohorts. myInterview takes 1 of the 7 criteria, Post-Market Monitoring among them, against 6 for TalentLens, whose share includes Article 11 Technical Documentation. Customer Documentation is the widest raw gap (myInterview 40, TalentLens 58) but not the heaviest weighted swing, which is Article 11 Technical Documentation at 20% (myInterview 38, TalentLens 52), 31% of the weighted advantage TalentLens builds across the 6 criteria it leads.

§ The record

myInterview is filed under Video interview AI, TalentLens under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Illinois HB 3773, Mobley v. Workday and Colorado AI Act.

RecordmyInterviewTalentLens
Price tierMidMid
HeadquartersAUGB
Founded2014Not recorded

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 30% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    myInterview 38 · TalentLens 52

    2.8 weighted points to TalentLens

  2. 18% weight · 50% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    myInterview 35 · TalentLens 45

    1.8 weighted points to TalentLens

  3. 8% weight · 66% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    myInterview 40 · TalentLens 58

    1.4 weighted points to TalentLens

  4. 15% weight · 79% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    myInterview 42 · TalentLens 50

    1.2 weighted points to TalentLens

  5. 12% weight · 91% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    myInterview 48 · TalentLens 57

    1.1 weighted points to TalentLens

  6. 15% weight · 99% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    myInterview 25 · TalentLens 30

    0.8 weighted points to TalentLens

  7. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    myInterview 33 · TalentLens 32

    0.1 weighted points to myInterview

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -8.9 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 9.2 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -9 beside that -8.9.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is myInterview minus TalentLens.

CategoryWeightmyInterviewTalentLensΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%3852-14-2.8
Bias Audit Transparency18%3545-10-1.8
FRIA Support15%2530-5-0.8
Data Governance Disclosure15%4250-8-1.2
Human Oversight Design12%4857-9-1.1
Post-Market Monitoring12%3332+1+0.1
Customer Documentation8%4058-18-1.4
Total100%37 (F)46 (F)-9-8.9

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightmyInterviewTalentLens
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%11—41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%11—31Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%01—21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%20Sources on a separate domain40Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%11—40Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%11Sources on a separate domain31Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Customer Documentation8%11Sources on a separate domain41Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%76Sources on a separate domain245Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

myInterview has 13 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 7 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; TalentLens has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 24 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for myInterview and TalentLens sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 42 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 13 for myInterview, across 2 distinct source domains, and 29 for TalentLens, across 3 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
myInterview last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
TalentLens last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.