§ The result
Teamtailor leads myInterview by 10 points.
Teamtailor sits 10 points above myInterview under rubric v1.0 — 47 against 37 — with Teamtailor filed under ATS-integrated and myInterview under Video interview. Teamtailor leads 6 of the 7 criteria, including FRIA Support, while myInterview leads 1, including Bias Audit Transparency. The widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing fall on different criteria: Customer Documentation (myInterview 40, Teamtailor 62) and FRIA Support at 15% (myInterview 25, Teamtailor 42), the second being 23% of the weighted advantage Teamtailor holds across the 6 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
myInterview
myInterview is an asynchronous one-way video interview platform that records candidate video responses and applies AI-assisted "Smart Shortlisting" and Big Five-based personality insights to help recruiters screen and rank applicants.
Vendor profile
Teamtailor
Teamtailor is a Stockholm-based applicant tracking and employer-branding platform whose OpenAI-powered "Co-pilot" assists recruiters with candidate screening, resume and interview summaries, talent-pool matching, interview-question generation, and AI-assisted job-ad and content writing.
§ The record
myInterview is filed under Video interview AI, Teamtailor under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Illinois HB 3773 and Colorado AI Act. Only myInterview is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | myInterview | Teamtailor |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | AU | SE |
| Founded | 2014 | 2013 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
15% weight · 22% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
myInterview 25 · Teamtailor 42
2.5 weighted points to Teamtailor
20% weight · 42% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
myInterview 38 · Teamtailor 50
2.4 weighted points to Teamtailor
15% weight · 62% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
myInterview 42 · Teamtailor 58
2.4 weighted points to Teamtailor
8% weight · 77% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
myInterview 40 · Teamtailor 62
1.8 weighted points to Teamtailor
12% weight · 86% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
myInterview 33 · Teamtailor 42
1.1 weighted points to Teamtailor
18% weight · 94% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
myInterview 35 · Teamtailor 30
0.9 weighted points to myInterview
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
myInterview 48 · Teamtailor 54
0.7 weighted points to Teamtailor
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -10.0 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 11.8 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -10 beside that -10.0.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is myInterview minus Teamtailor.
| Category | Weight | myInterview | Teamtailor | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 38 | 50 | -12 | -2.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 35 | 30 | +5 | +0.9 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 42 | -17 | -2.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 42 | 58 | -16 | -2.4 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 48 | 54 | -6 | -0.7 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 33 | 42 | -9 | -1.1 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 40 | 62 | -22 | -1.8 |
| Total | 100% | 37 (F) | 47 (F) | -10 | -10.0 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | myInterview | Teamtailor | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 1 | 1 | — | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 0 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 7 | 6 | Sources on a separate domain | 14 | 6 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
myInterview has 13 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 7 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Teamtailor has 20 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 14 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for myInterview sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 33 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 13 for myInterview, across 2 distinct source domains, and 20 for Teamtailor, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- myInterview last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Teamtailor last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next