§ The result
Thomas International leads myInterview on all 7 criteria.
Thomas International sits 11 points above myInterview under rubric v1.0 — 48 against 37 — with Thomas International filed under Assessment and myInterview under Video interview. Thomas International leads every one of the 7 criteria, myInterview none of them, and the closest of the 7 is Human Oversight Design, myInterview 48 to Thomas International 51. The widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing fall on different criteria: Customer Documentation (myInterview 40, Thomas International 60) and Article 11 Technical Documentation at 20% (myInterview 38, Thomas International 54), the second being 29% of the weighted advantage Thomas International holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
myInterview
myInterview is an asynchronous one-way video interview platform that records candidate video responses and applies AI-assisted "Smart Shortlisting" and Big Five-based personality insights to help recruiters screen and rank applicants.
Vendor profile
Thomas International
Thomas International provides psychometric and aptitude assessments (behaviour/DISC, cognitive ability, personality and emotional intelligence) with an AI coaching layer, used for hiring, candidate selection and employee development.
§ The record
myInterview is filed under Video interview AI, Thomas International under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Illinois HB 3773, Mobley v. Workday and Colorado AI Act.
| Record | myInterview | Thomas International |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | AU | GB |
| Founded | 2014 | 1981 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 29% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
myInterview 38 · Thomas International 54
3.2 weighted points to Thomas International
15% weight · 50% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
myInterview 42 · Thomas International 57
2.3 weighted points to Thomas International
8% weight · 65% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
myInterview 40 · Thomas International 60
1.6 weighted points to Thomas International
18% weight · 78% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
myInterview 35 · Thomas International 43
1.4 weighted points to Thomas International
15% weight · 89% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
myInterview 25 · Thomas International 33
1.2 weighted points to Thomas International
12% weight · 97% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
myInterview 33 · Thomas International 40
0.8 weighted points to Thomas International
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
myInterview 48 · Thomas International 51
0.4 weighted points to Thomas International
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -10.9 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 10.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -11 beside that -10.9.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is myInterview minus Thomas International.
| Category | Weight | myInterview | Thomas International | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 38 | 54 | -16 | -3.2 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 35 | 43 | -8 | -1.4 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 33 | -8 | -1.2 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 42 | 57 | -15 | -2.3 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 48 | 51 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 33 | 40 | -7 | -0.8 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 40 | 60 | -20 | -1.6 |
| Total | 100% | 37 (F) | 48 (F) | -11 | -10.9 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | myInterview | Thomas International | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 1 | 1 | — | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 0 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 7 | 6 | Sources on a separate domain | 11 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
myInterview has 13 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 7 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Thomas International has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for myInterview sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 30 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 13 for myInterview, across 2 distinct source domains, and 17 for Thomas International, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- myInterview last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Thomas International last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.