HomeComparemyInterview vs Versant by Pearson

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

myInterview vs Versant by Pearson

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

Versant by Pearson leads myInterview on all 7 criteria.

Versant by Pearson sits 12 points above myInterview under rubric v1.0 — 49 against 37 — with Versant by Pearson filed under Assessment and myInterview under Video interview. Versant by Pearson takes all 7 criteria and myInterview none of them; the nearest contest is FRIA Support, myInterview 25 to Versant by Pearson 30. One criterion, Article 11 Technical Documentation, is both the widest raw gap (myInterview 38, Versant by Pearson 63) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 20% weight it makes up 40% of the weighted advantage Versant by Pearson holds across the 7 criteria it leads.

§ The record

myInterview is filed under Video interview AI, Versant by Pearson under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Illinois HB 3773, Mobley v. Workday and Colorado AI Act.

RecordmyInterviewVersant by Pearson
Price tierMidMid
HeadquartersAUGB
Founded20141844

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 40% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    myInterview 38 · Versant by Pearson 63

    5.0 weighted points to Versant by Pearson

  2. 8% weight · 53% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    myInterview 40 · Versant by Pearson 61

    1.7 weighted points to Versant by Pearson

  3. 15% weight · 67% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    myInterview 42 · Versant by Pearson 53

    1.6 weighted points to Versant by Pearson

  4. 18% weight · 77% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    myInterview 35 · Versant by Pearson 42

    1.3 weighted points to Versant by Pearson

  5. 12% weight · 86% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    myInterview 33 · Versant by Pearson 43

    1.2 weighted points to Versant by Pearson

  6. 12% weight · 94% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    myInterview 48 · Versant by Pearson 56

    1.0 weighted points to Versant by Pearson

  7. 15% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    myInterview 25 · Versant by Pearson 30

    0.8 weighted points to Versant by Pearson

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -12.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 12.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -12 beside that -12.5.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is myInterview minus Versant by Pearson.

CategoryWeightmyInterviewVersant by PearsonΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%3863-25-5.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%3542-7-1.3
FRIA Support15%2530-5-0.8
Data Governance Disclosure15%4253-11-1.6
Human Oversight Design12%4856-8-1.0
Post-Market Monitoring12%3343-10-1.2
Customer Documentation8%4061-21-1.7
Total100%37 (F)49 (F)-12-12.5

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightmyInterviewVersant by Pearson
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%11—31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%11—41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%01—21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%20Sources on a separate domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%11—50Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%11Sources on a separate domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%11Sources on a separate domain41Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%76Sources on a separate domain236Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

myInterview has 13 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 7 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Versant by Pearson has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 23 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for myInterview and Versant by Pearson sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 42 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 13 for myInterview, across 2 distinct source domains, and 29 for Versant by Pearson, across 2 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
myInterview last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Versant by Pearson last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.