HomeComparemyInterview vs Willo

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

myInterview vs Willo

Export comparison (CSV)Pro

§ The result

4 points separate Willo and myInterview.

Within the Video interview cohort, Willo edges myInterview by 4 points under rubric v1.0, 41 to 37. Willo leads 4 of the 7 criteria, including Human Oversight Design, while myInterview leads 1, including Bias Audit Transparency, and 2 are level. Human Oversight Design is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (myInterview 48, Willo 62, 12% weight), but it accounts for only 35% of the weighted advantage Willo holds across the 4 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

myInterview and Willo are both filed under Video interview AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Illinois HB 3773, Mobley v. Workday and Colorado AI Act.

RecordmyInterviewWillo
Price tierMidLow
HeadquartersAUGB
Founded20142018

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 12% weight · 29% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    myInterview 48 · Willo 62

    1.7 weighted points to Willo

  2. 15% weight · 58% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    myInterview 42 · Willo 53

    1.6 weighted points to Willo

  3. 8% weight · 78% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    myInterview 40 · Willo 54

    1.1 weighted points to Willo

  4. 18% weight · 94% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    myInterview 35 · Willo 30

    0.9 weighted points to myInterview

  5. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    myInterview 33 · Willo 36

    0.4 weighted points to Willo

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 5 figures above sum to -3.9 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 5.7 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -4 beside that -3.9.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is myInterview minus Willo.

CategoryWeightmyInterviewWilloΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%3838--
Bias Audit Transparency18%3530+5+0.9
FRIA Support15%2525--
Data Governance Disclosure15%4253-11-1.6
Human Oversight Design12%4862-14-1.7
Post-Market Monitoring12%3336-3-0.4
Customer Documentation8%4054-14-1.1
Total100%37 (F)41 (F)-4-3.9

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightmyInterviewWillo
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%1121Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%1111
FRIA Support15%0101
Data Governance Disclosure15%20Sources on a separate domain20Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%1120Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%11Sources on a separate domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%11Sources on a separate domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%76Sources on a separate domain95Sources on the vendor's own domain

myInterview has 13 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 7 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Willo has 14 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for myInterview sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 27 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 13 for myInterview, across 2 distinct source domains, and 14 for Willo, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
myInterview last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Willo last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.