§ The result
Wonderlic leads myInterview by 6 points.
Wonderlic scores 43 and myInterview 37 under rubric v1.0, a 6-point gap across the Assessment and Video interview cohorts. Wonderlic leads 4 of the 7 criteria, including Article 11 Technical Documentation, while myInterview leads 1, including Data Governance Disclosure, and 2 are level. Wonderlic takes the heaviest weighted swing, Article 11 Technical Documentation at 20% (myInterview 38, Wonderlic 52), which is 41% of the weighted advantage Wonderlic holds; the widest raw gap is a different criterion, Customer Documentation, myInterview 40 to Wonderlic 55.
Vendor profile
myInterview
myInterview is an asynchronous one-way video interview platform that records candidate video responses and applies AI-assisted "Smart Shortlisting" and Big Five-based personality insights to help recruiters screen and rank applicants.
Vendor profile
Wonderlic
Wonderlic Select (formerly WonScore) is a pre-employment assessment that combines cognitive ability, personality, and motivation tests to score and rank candidates for job fit.
§ The record
myInterview is filed under Video interview AI, Wonderlic under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Illinois HB 3773, Mobley v. Workday and Colorado AI Act.
| Record | myInterview | Wonderlic |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | AU | US |
| Founded | 2014 | 1937 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 38% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
myInterview 38 · Wonderlic 52
2.8 weighted points to Wonderlic
18% weight · 69% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
myInterview 35 · Wonderlic 48
2.3 weighted points to Wonderlic
8% weight · 85% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
myInterview 40 · Wonderlic 55
1.2 weighted points to Wonderlic
15% weight · 94% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
myInterview 42 · Wonderlic 38
0.6 weighted points to myInterview
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
myInterview 48 · Wonderlic 52
0.5 weighted points to Wonderlic
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 5 figures above sum to -6.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 7.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -6 beside that -6.2.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is myInterview minus Wonderlic.
| Category | Weight | myInterview | Wonderlic | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 38 | 52 | -14 | -2.8 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 35 | 48 | -13 | -2.3 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 25 | - | - |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 42 | 38 | +4 | +0.6 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 48 | 52 | -4 | -0.5 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 33 | 33 | - | - |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 40 | 55 | -15 | -1.2 |
| Total | 100% | 37 (F) | 43 (F) | -6 | -6.2 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | myInterview | Wonderlic | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 1 | 1 | — | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 0 | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 7 | 6 | Sources on a separate domain | 9 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
myInterview has 13 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 7 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Wonderlic has 15 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for myInterview sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 28 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 13 for myInterview, across 2 distinct source domains, and 15 for Wonderlic, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- myInterview last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Wonderlic last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next