§ The result
Workday Recruiting AI leads myInterview on all 7 criteria.
Workday Recruiting AI finishes 19 points clear of myInterview under rubric v1.0 — 56 against 37 — across the ATS-integrated and Video interview cohorts. Workday Recruiting AI leads every one of the 7 criteria and 3 of them by 20 raw points or more, Article 11 Technical Documentation among them; myInterview leads none. Article 11 Technical Documentation is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (myInterview 38, Workday Recruiting AI 70, 20% weight), but it accounts for only 34% of the weighted advantage Workday Recruiting AI holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
myInterview
myInterview is an asynchronous one-way video interview platform that records candidate video responses and applies AI-assisted "Smart Shortlisting" and Big Five-based personality insights to help recruiters screen and rank applicants.
Vendor profile
Workday Recruiting AI
AI features built into Workday Recruiting, including candidate-skill matching and recruiter productivity tools, surfaced inside the Workday ATS.
§ The record
myInterview is filed under Video interview AI, Workday Recruiting AI under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only myInterview is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | myInterview | Workday Recruiting AI |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | AU | US |
| Founded | 2014 | 2005 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 34% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
myInterview 38 · Workday Recruiting AI 70
6.4 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
18% weight · 59% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
myInterview 35 · Workday Recruiting AI 60
4.5 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
12% weight · 69% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
myInterview 48 · Workday Recruiting AI 65
2.0 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
8% weight · 80% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
myInterview 40 · Workday Recruiting AI 65
2.0 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
15% weight · 91% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
myInterview 42 · Workday Recruiting AI 55
1.9 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
15% weight · 99% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
myInterview 25 · Workday Recruiting AI 35
1.5 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
myInterview 33 · Workday Recruiting AI 35
0.2 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -18.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 18.6 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -19 beside that -18.6.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is myInterview minus Workday Recruiting AI.
| Category | Weight | myInterview | Workday Recruiting AI | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 38 | 70 | -32 | -6.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 35 | 60 | -25 | -4.5 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 35 | -10 | -1.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 42 | 55 | -13 | -1.9 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 48 | 65 | -17 | -2.0 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 33 | 35 | -2 | -0.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 40 | 65 | -25 | -2.0 |
| Total | 100% | 37 (F) | 56 (F) | -19 | -18.6 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | myInterview | Workday Recruiting AI | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 1 | 1 | — | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 0 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 7 | 6 | Sources on a separate domain | 9 | 2 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
myInterview has 13 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 7 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Workday Recruiting AI has 11 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for myInterview sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 24 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 13 for myInterview, across 2 distinct source domains, and 11 for Workday Recruiting AI, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- myInterview last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Workday Recruiting AI last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.