§ The result
3 points separate ZipRecruiter and myInterview.
ZipRecruiter (Sourcing) edges myInterview (Video interview) by 3 points under rubric v1.0, 40 to 37. myInterview takes 1 of the 7 criteria, Bias Audit Transparency among them, against 6 for ZipRecruiter, whose share includes Data Governance Disclosure. myInterview takes the heaviest weighted swing, Bias Audit Transparency at 18% (myInterview 35, ZipRecruiter 24), 100% of the weighted advantage it builds, while the widest raw gap is on Customer Documentation, myInterview 40 to ZipRecruiter 54.
Vendor profile
myInterview
myInterview is an asynchronous one-way video interview platform that records candidate video responses and applies AI-assisted "Smart Shortlisting" and Big Five-based personality insights to help recruiters screen and rank applicants.
Vendor profile
ZipRecruiter
ZipRecruiter is an online employment marketplace whose AI matching engine sends employers' job postings out, alerts matched job seekers and invites them to apply, and labels and ranks applicants (for example as 'Great Match') in the employer's candidate dashboard.
§ The record
myInterview is filed under Video interview AI, ZipRecruiter under Candidate sourcing AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Illinois HB 3773 and Colorado AI Act. Only myInterview is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | myInterview | ZipRecruiter |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | AU | US |
| Founded | 2014 | 2010 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 28% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
myInterview 35 · ZipRecruiter 24
2.0 weighted points to myInterview
15% weight · 50% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
myInterview 42 · ZipRecruiter 52
1.5 weighted points to ZipRecruiter
8% weight · 66% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
myInterview 40 · ZipRecruiter 54
1.1 weighted points to ZipRecruiter
12% weight · 78% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
myInterview 48 · ZipRecruiter 55
0.8 weighted points to ZipRecruiter
12% weight · 90% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
myInterview 33 · ZipRecruiter 40
0.8 weighted points to ZipRecruiter
20% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
myInterview 38 · ZipRecruiter 40
0.4 weighted points to ZipRecruiter
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
myInterview 25 · ZipRecruiter 27
0.3 weighted points to ZipRecruiter
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -3.0 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 7.0 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -3 beside that -3.0.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is myInterview minus ZipRecruiter.
| Category | Weight | myInterview | ZipRecruiter | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 38 | 40 | -2 | -0.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 35 | 24 | +11 | +2.0 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 27 | -2 | -0.3 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 42 | 52 | -10 | -1.5 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 48 | 55 | -7 | -0.8 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 33 | 40 | -7 | -0.8 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 40 | 54 | -14 | -1.1 |
| Total | 100% | 37 (F) | 40 (F) | -3 | -3.0 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | myInterview | ZipRecruiter | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 1 | 1 | — | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | — | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 0 | 1 | — | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 7 | 6 | Sources on a separate domain | 28 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
myInterview has 13 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 7 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; ZipRecruiter has 33 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 28 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for myInterview and ZipRecruiter sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 46 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 13 for myInterview, across 2 distinct source domains, and 33 for ZipRecruiter, across 6 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- myInterview last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- ZipRecruiter last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next