Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Oleeo vs Pillar
Oleeo
Oleeo is an enterprise applicant tracking and talent acquisition platform that uses machine learning to score, rank, and screen candidates from resumes, applications, and assessment responses, with prescriptive interview and hire recommendations and a stated diversity/bias-mitigation focus.
Substantial gaps
ATS-integrated
Pillar
Pillar (now "AI Interview Companion by Employ") is an interview intelligence platform that records and transcribes job interviews, generates AI interview guides and highlight clips, and surfaces candidate insights and interviewer-coaching recommendations.
Substantial gaps
Screening
The result
Oleeo and Pillar tie at 40.
Oleeo, filed under ATS-integrated, and Pillar, filed under Screening, tie at 40 under rubric v1.0 by different routes through the criteria. Oleeo leads 3 of the 7 criteria and Pillar 3, with 1 level, yet the two totals land on the same number. Human Oversight Design is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Oleeo 55, Pillar 48 — and at a 12% weight it carries 52% of the weighted advantage Oleeo holds across the 3 criteria on that side of the table.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Oleeo3
- Pillar3
- Level1
- Widest raw gap
- Human Oversight Design55 vs 48
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Human Oversight Design12% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Oleeo is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Pillar under Screening AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
Only Pillar is in scope of
| Record | Oleeo | Pillar |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | GB | US |
| Founded | 1995 | 2019 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Human Oversight Design
12% weight27% of the movement so far
Oleeo55Pillar480.8 weighted points to Oleeo
- 2
FRIA Support
15% weight51% of the movement so far
Oleeo25Pillar300.8 weighted points to Pillar
- 3
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight64% of the movement so far
Oleeo40Pillar420.4 weighted points to Pillar
- 4
Customer Documentation
8% weight77% of the movement so far
Oleeo55Pillar500.4 weighted points to Oleeo
- 5
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight88% of the movement so far
Oleeo40Pillar380.4 weighted points to Oleeo
- 6
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight100% of the movement so far
Oleeo30Pillar330.4 weighted points to Pillar
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +0.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 3.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads 0 beside that +0.1.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Oleeo minus Pillar, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Oleeo | Pillar | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 40 | 42 | -2 | -0.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 40 | 38 | +2 | +0.4 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 30 | -5 | -0.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 45 | 45 | - | - |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 48 | +7 | +0.8 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 33 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 55 | 50 | +5 | +0.4 |
| Total | 100% | 40F | 40F | - | +0.1 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Oleeo | Pillar | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 0 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 10 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 12 | 7 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
Oleeo has 16 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 10 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Pillar has 19 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 7 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 35 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 16 for Oleeo, across 1 distinct source domain, and 19 for Pillar, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Oleeo last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Pillar last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.