§ The result
PageUp leads Phenom on all 7 criteria.
PageUp sits 12 points above Phenom under rubric v1.0 — 64 (D) against 52 (F) — with PageUp filed under ATS-integrated and Phenom under Sourcing. PageUp leads every one of the 7 criteria, Phenom none of them, and the closest of the 7 is Data Governance Disclosure, PageUp 63 to Phenom 60. Post-Market Monitoring is the widest raw gap (PageUp 55, Phenom 30) but not the heaviest weighted swing, which is Article 11 Technical Documentation at 20% (PageUp 74, Phenom 55), 33% of the weighted advantage PageUp builds across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
PageUp
PageUp is an enterprise talent acquisition suite (ATS, recruitment marketing/CRM, onboarding, learning and performance). Its AI Skills Matching sorts each applicant's resume against skills taken from the job ad into five bands, from Excellent Match to Not a Match, and recruiters reach those results through Paige, its conversational assistant.
Vendor profile
Phenom
Talent experience platform combining a career site CMS, candidate CRM, internal mobility, and conversational AI for screening and scheduling.
§ The record
PageUp is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Phenom under Candidate sourcing AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773.
| Record | PageUp | Phenom |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | AU | US |
| Founded | 1997 | 2010 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 33% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
PageUp 74 · Phenom 55
3.8 weighted points to PageUp
12% weight · 59% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
PageUp 55 · Phenom 30
3.0 weighted points to PageUp
15% weight · 79% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
PageUp 40 · Phenom 25
2.3 weighted points to PageUp
18% weight · 86% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
PageUp 80 · Phenom 75
0.9 weighted points to PageUp
8% weight · 92% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
PageUp 63 · Phenom 55
0.6 weighted points to PageUp
12% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
PageUp 64 · Phenom 60
0.5 weighted points to PageUp
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
PageUp 63 · Phenom 60
0.4 weighted points to PageUp
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +11.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 11.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +12 beside that +11.5.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is PageUp minus Phenom.
| Category | Weight | PageUp | Phenom | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 74 | 55 | +19 | +3.8 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 80 | 75 | +5 | +0.9 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 40 | 25 | +15 | +2.3 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 63 | 60 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 64 | 60 | +4 | +0.5 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 55 | 30 | +25 | +3.0 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 63 | 55 | +8 | +0.6 |
| Total | 100% | 64 (D) | 52 (F) | +12 | +11.5 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | PageUp | Phenom | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | — |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 24 | 4 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 8 | 2 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
PageUp has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 24 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; Phenom has 10 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 8 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for PageUp sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 38 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 28 for PageUp, across 2 distinct source domains, and 10 for Phenom, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- PageUp last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Phenom last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next