§ The result
PageUp leads Willo on all 7 criteria.
PageUp finishes 23 points clear of Willo under rubric v1.0 — 64 (D) against 41 (F) — across the ATS-integrated and Video interview cohorts. PageUp leads every one of the 7 criteria, Willo none of them, and the closest of the 7 is Human Oversight Design, PageUp 64 to Willo 62. Bias Audit Transparency is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (PageUp 80, Willo 30, 18% weight), but it accounts for only 39% of the weighted advantage PageUp holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
PageUp
PageUp is an enterprise talent acquisition suite (ATS, recruitment marketing/CRM, onboarding, learning and performance). Its AI Skills Matching sorts each applicant's resume against skills taken from the job ad into five bands, from Excellent Match to Not a Match, and recruiters reach those results through Paige, its conversational assistant.
Vendor profile
Willo
Willo is a browser-based asynchronous (one-way) video interview platform that lets employers collect recorded video, audio, multiple-choice and written candidate responses, then uses AI to transcribe, summarize, rank candidates against employer-defined "Blueprint" criteria, and flag scripted or AI-generated answers.
§ The record
PageUp is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Willo under Video interview AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only Willo is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | PageUp | Willo |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Low |
| Headquarters | AU | GB |
| Founded | 1997 | 2018 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 39% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
PageUp 80 · Willo 30
9.0 weighted points to PageUp
20% weight · 70% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
PageUp 74 · Willo 38
7.2 weighted points to PageUp
12% weight · 80% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
PageUp 55 · Willo 36
2.3 weighted points to PageUp
15% weight · 89% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
PageUp 40 · Willo 25
2.3 weighted points to PageUp
15% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
PageUp 63 · Willo 53
1.5 weighted points to PageUp
8% weight · 99% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
PageUp 63 · Willo 54
0.7 weighted points to PageUp
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
PageUp 64 · Willo 62
0.2 weighted points to PageUp
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +23.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 23.2 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +23 beside that +23.2.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is PageUp minus Willo.
| Category | Weight | PageUp | Willo | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 74 | 38 | +36 | +7.2 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 80 | 30 | +50 | +9.0 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 40 | 25 | +15 | +2.3 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 63 | 53 | +10 | +1.5 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 64 | 62 | +2 | +0.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 55 | 36 | +19 | +2.3 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 63 | 54 | +9 | +0.7 |
| Total | 100% | 64 (D) | 41 (F) | +23 | +23.2 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | PageUp | Willo | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 24 | 4 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 9 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
PageUp has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 24 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; Willo has 14 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for PageUp sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 42 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 28 for PageUp, across 2 distinct source domains, and 14 for Willo, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- PageUp last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Willo last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next