§ The result
PageUp leads X0PA AI on all 7 criteria.
PageUp finishes 16 points clear of X0PA AI under rubric v1.0 — 64 (D) against 48 (F) — across the ATS-integrated and Assessment cohorts. PageUp leads every one of the 7 criteria, X0PA AI none of them, and the closest of the 7 is FRIA Support, PageUp 40 to X0PA AI 38. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (PageUp 80, X0PA AI 44) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 42% of the weighted advantage PageUp holds across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
PageUp
PageUp is an enterprise talent acquisition suite (ATS, recruitment marketing/CRM, onboarding, learning and performance). Its AI Skills Matching sorts each applicant's resume against skills taken from the job ad into five bands, from Excellent Match to Not a Match, and recruiters reach those results through Paige, its conversational assistant.
Vendor profile
X0PA AI
X0PA AI is a Singapore-based B2B AI recruitment platform (applicant tracking system) that sources, screens, scores, and ranks candidates using proprietary predictive-scoring models (BRIQ Score and Suitability Score) plus the X0PA ROOM video-interview/assessment product, marketed around bias-reduced, "responsible and explainable" AI hiring.
§ The record
PageUp is filed under ATS-integrated AI, X0PA AI under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only X0PA AI is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | PageUp | X0PA AI |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | High |
| Headquarters | AU | SG |
| Founded | 1997 | 2017 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 42% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
PageUp 80 · X0PA AI 44
6.5 weighted points to PageUp
20% weight · 73% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
PageUp 74 · X0PA AI 50
4.8 weighted points to PageUp
12% weight · 84% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
PageUp 55 · X0PA AI 40
1.8 weighted points to PageUp
15% weight · 91% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
PageUp 63 · X0PA AI 56
1.1 weighted points to PageUp
12% weight · 97% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
PageUp 64 · X0PA AI 57
0.8 weighted points to PageUp
15% weight · 98% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
PageUp 40 · X0PA AI 38
0.3 weighted points to PageUp
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
PageUp 63 · X0PA AI 60
0.2 weighted points to PageUp
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +15.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 15.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +16 beside that +15.5.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is PageUp minus X0PA AI.
| Category | Weight | PageUp | X0PA AI | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 74 | 50 | +24 | +4.8 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 80 | 44 | +36 | +6.5 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 40 | 38 | +2 | +0.3 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 63 | 56 | +7 | +1.1 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 64 | 57 | +7 | +0.8 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 55 | 40 | +15 | +1.8 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 63 | 60 | +3 | +0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 64 (D) | 48 (F) | +16 | +15.5 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | PageUp | X0PA AI | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 24 | 4 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 12 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
PageUp has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 24 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; X0PA AI has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for PageUp and X0PA AI sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 46 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 28 for PageUp, across 2 distinct source domains, and 18 for X0PA AI, across 3 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- PageUp last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- X0PA AI last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next