HomeComparePhenom vs Vervoe

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Phenom vs Vervoe

Export comparison (CSV)Pro

§ The result

Phenom leads Vervoe by 6 points.

Phenom scores 52 and Vervoe 46 under rubric v1.0, a 6-point gap across the Sourcing and Assessment cohorts. Phenom leads 4 of the 7 criteria, including Bias Audit Transparency, while Vervoe leads 1, including Customer Documentation, and 2 are level. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Phenom 75, Vervoe 52 — and at an 18% weight it carries 58% of the weighted advantage Phenom holds across the 4 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Phenom is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Vervoe under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only Vervoe is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordPhenomVervoe
Price tierEnterpriseMid
HeadquartersUSAU
Founded20102016

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 56% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Phenom 75 · Vervoe 52

    4.1 weighted points to Phenom

  2. 20% weight · 83% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Phenom 55 · Vervoe 45

    2.0 weighted points to Phenom

  3. 15% weight · 93% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Phenom 60 · Vervoe 55

    0.8 weighted points to Phenom

  4. 12% weight · 97% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Phenom 30 · Vervoe 28

    0.2 weighted points to Phenom

  5. 8% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Phenom 55 · Vervoe 58

    0.2 weighted points to Vervoe

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 5 figures above sum to +6.9 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 7.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +6 beside that +6.9.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Phenom minus Vervoe.

CategoryWeightPhenomVervoeΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%5545+10+2.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%7552+23+4.1
FRIA Support15%2525--
Data Governance Disclosure15%6055+5+0.8
Human Oversight Design12%6060--
Post-Market Monitoring12%3028+2+0.2
Customer Documentation8%5558-3-0.2
Total100%52 (F)46 (F)+6+6.9

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightPhenomVervoe
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%20Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%20Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain21Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
FRIA Support15%0101
Data Governance Disclosure15%10Sources on the vendor's own domain40Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%1030Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%0111
Customer Documentation8%20Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%82Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain155Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain

Phenom has 10 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 8 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; Vervoe has 20 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 15 with a source URL, 5 documented absences.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 30 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 10 for Phenom, across 1 distinct source domain, and 20 for Vervoe, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
Phenom last reviewed
May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Vervoe last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.