HomeComparePin vs Pulsifi

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Pin vs Pulsifi

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

Pin leads Pulsifi by 7 points.

Pin scores 40 and Pulsifi 33 under rubric v1.0, a 7-point gap across the Sourcing and Assessment cohorts. Pulsifi takes 1 of the 7 criteria, Human Oversight Design among them, against 5 for Pin, whose share includes Bias Audit Transparency, and 1 is level. Post-Market Monitoring is the widest raw gap (Pin 45, Pulsifi 28) but not the heaviest weighted swing, which is Bias Audit Transparency at 18% (Pin 35, Pulsifi 20), 35% of the weighted advantage Pin builds across the 5 criteria it leads.

§ The record

Pin is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Pulsifi under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only Pulsifi is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordPinPulsifi
Price tierLowMid
HeadquartersUSSG
Founded20242017

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 32% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Pin 35 · Pulsifi 20

    2.7 weighted points to Pin

  2. 12% weight · 57% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Pin 45 · Pulsifi 28

    2.0 weighted points to Pin

  3. 15% weight · 75% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Pin 50 · Pulsifi 40

    1.5 weighted points to Pin

  4. 15% weight · 84% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Pin 30 · Pulsifi 25

    0.8 weighted points to Pin

  5. 8% weight · 93% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Pin 55 · Pulsifi 46

    0.7 weighted points to Pin

  6. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Pin 50 · Pulsifi 55

    0.6 weighted points to Pulsifi

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +7.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 8.3 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +7 beside that +7.1.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Pin minus Pulsifi.

CategoryWeightPinPulsifiΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%3030--
Bias Audit Transparency18%3520+15+2.7
FRIA Support15%3025+5+0.8
Data Governance Disclosure15%5040+10+1.5
Human Oversight Design12%5055-5-0.6
Post-Market Monitoring12%4528+17+2.0
Customer Documentation8%5546+9+0.7
Total100%40 (F)33 (F)+7+7.1

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightPinPulsifi
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%31Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%31Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain31—
FRIA Support15%31Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%70Sources on the vendor's own domain60Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%60Sources on the vendor's own domain51Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%51Sources on the vendor's own domain32Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%51Sources on the vendor's own domain51Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%325Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain267Sources on the vendor's own domain

Pin has 37 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 32 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Pulsifi has 33 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 26 with a source URL, 7 documented absences.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 70 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 37 for Pin, across 1 distinct source domain, and 33 for Pulsifi, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
Pin last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Pulsifi last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.