HomeComparePin vs Talview

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Pin vs Talview

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

Talview takes the total, Pin takes more of the criteria.

Talview (Video interview) edges Pin (Sourcing) by 2 points under rubric v1.0, 42 to 40. Pin leads more of the criteria than Talview — 4 to 3 — but Article 11 Technical Documentation, which Talview leads, carries 20% of the rubric, and the weighted sum still falls to Talview. One criterion, Article 11 Technical Documentation, is both the widest raw gap (Pin 30, Talview 50) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 20% weight it makes up 78% of the weighted advantage Talview holds across the 3 criteria it leads.

§ The record

Pin is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Talview under Video interview AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only Talview is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordPinTalview
Price tierLowEnterprise
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded20242012

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 50% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Pin 30 · Talview 50

    4.0 weighted points to Talview

  2. 12% weight · 70% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Pin 45 · Talview 32

    1.6 weighted points to Pin

  3. 15% weight · 79% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Pin 30 · Talview 25

    0.8 weighted points to Pin

  4. 12% weight · 86% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Pin 50 · Talview 55

    0.6 weighted points to Talview

  5. 18% weight · 93% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Pin 35 · Talview 38

    0.5 weighted points to Talview

  6. 15% weight · 97% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Pin 50 · Talview 48

    0.3 weighted points to Pin

  7. 8% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Pin 55 · Talview 52

    0.2 weighted points to Pin

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -2.3 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 8.0 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -2 beside that -2.3.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Pin minus Talview.

CategoryWeightPinTalviewΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%3050-20-4.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%3538-3-0.5
FRIA Support15%3025+5+0.8
Data Governance Disclosure15%5048+2+0.3
Human Oversight Design12%5055-5-0.6
Post-Market Monitoring12%4532+13+1.6
Customer Documentation8%5552+3+0.2
Total100%40 (F)42 (F)-2-2.3

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightPinTalview
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%31Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%31Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain11—
FRIA Support15%31Sources on the vendor's own domain01—
Data Governance Disclosure15%70Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%60Sources on the vendor's own domain20Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%51Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%51Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%325Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain116Sources on the vendor's own domain

Pin has 37 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 32 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Talview has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 6 documented absences.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 54 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 37 for Pin, across 1 distinct source domain, and 17 for Talview, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
Pin last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Talview last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.