§ The result
Pinpoint leads Pulsifi on all 7 criteria.
Pinpoint finishes 24 points clear of Pulsifi under rubric v1.0 — 57 against 33 — across the ATS-integrated and Assessment cohorts. Pinpoint leads every one of the 7 criteria and 5 of them by 20 raw points or more, Article 11 Technical Documentation among them; Pulsifi leads none. Even Article 11 Technical Documentation, the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (Pinpoint 72, Pulsifi 30, 20% weight), is only 35% of the weighted advantage Pinpoint builds across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Pinpoint
Pinpoint is an applicant tracking system for in-house talent teams that layers AI-assisted screening onto core hiring workflows - candidate match scores, AI filters, anonymized screening, an interview notetaker, and a hiring copilot for outreach and rejections.
Vendor profile
Pulsifi
Pulsifi gives candidates and employees 0-100 Role Fit and Organizational Fit scores that combine personality, work-interest, work-culture and cognitive assessments with AI resume and skills analysis, and uses the scores to rank people for hiring, internal mobility and succession.
§ The record
Pinpoint is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Pulsifi under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only Pulsifi is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Pinpoint | Pulsifi |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | JE | SG |
| Founded | 2017 | 2017 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 35% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Pinpoint 72 · Pulsifi 30
8.4 weighted points to Pinpoint
15% weight · 52% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Pinpoint 68 · Pulsifi 40
4.2 weighted points to Pinpoint
18% weight · 69% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Pinpoint 42 · Pulsifi 20
4.0 weighted points to Pinpoint
12% weight · 81% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Pinpoint 52 · Pulsifi 28
2.9 weighted points to Pinpoint
15% weight · 89% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Pinpoint 38 · Pulsifi 25
1.9 weighted points to Pinpoint
8% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Pinpoint 66 · Pulsifi 46
1.6 weighted points to Pinpoint
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Pinpoint 64 · Pulsifi 55
1.1 weighted points to Pinpoint
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +24.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 24.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +24 beside that +24.1.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Pinpoint minus Pulsifi.
| Category | Weight | Pinpoint | Pulsifi | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 72 | 30 | +42 | +8.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 42 | 20 | +22 | +4.0 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 38 | 25 | +13 | +1.9 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 68 | 40 | +28 | +4.2 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 64 | 55 | +9 | +1.1 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 52 | 28 | +24 | +2.9 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 66 | 46 | +20 | +1.6 |
| Total | 100% | 57 (F) | 33 (F) | +24 | +24.1 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Pinpoint | Pulsifi | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 18 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 26 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Pinpoint has 20 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 18 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; Pulsifi has 33 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 26 with a source URL, 7 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 53 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 20 for Pinpoint, across 2 distinct source domains, and 33 for Pulsifi, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Pinpoint last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Pulsifi last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next