§ The result
Pinpoint leads Willo on all 7 criteria.
Pinpoint finishes 16 points clear of Willo under rubric v1.0 — 57 against 41 — across the ATS-integrated and Video interview cohorts. Pinpoint leads every one of the 7 criteria, Willo none of them, and the closest of the 7 is Human Oversight Design, Pinpoint 64 to Willo 62. Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Pinpoint 72, Willo 38 — and at a 20% weight it carries 42% of the weighted advantage Pinpoint holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Pinpoint
Pinpoint is an applicant tracking system for in-house talent teams that layers AI-assisted screening onto core hiring workflows - candidate match scores, AI filters, anonymized screening, an interview notetaker, and a hiring copilot for outreach and rejections.
Vendor profile
Willo
Willo is a browser-based asynchronous (one-way) video interview platform that lets employers collect recorded video, audio, multiple-choice and written candidate responses, then uses AI to transcribe, summarize, rank candidates against employer-defined "Blueprint" criteria, and flag scripted or AI-generated answers.
§ The record
Pinpoint is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Willo under Video interview AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only Willo is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Pinpoint | Willo |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Low |
| Headquarters | JE | GB |
| Founded | 2017 | 2018 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 42% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Pinpoint 72 · Willo 38
6.8 weighted points to Pinpoint
15% weight · 56% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Pinpoint 68 · Willo 53
2.3 weighted points to Pinpoint
18% weight · 69% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Pinpoint 42 · Willo 30
2.2 weighted points to Pinpoint
15% weight · 81% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Pinpoint 38 · Willo 25
1.9 weighted points to Pinpoint
12% weight · 93% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Pinpoint 52 · Willo 36
1.9 weighted points to Pinpoint
8% weight · 99% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Pinpoint 66 · Willo 54
1.0 weighted points to Pinpoint
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Pinpoint 64 · Willo 62
0.2 weighted points to Pinpoint
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +16.3 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 16.3 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +16 beside that +16.3.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Pinpoint minus Willo.
| Category | Weight | Pinpoint | Willo | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 72 | 38 | +34 | +6.8 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 42 | 30 | +12 | +2.2 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 38 | 25 | +13 | +1.9 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 68 | 53 | +15 | +2.3 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 64 | 62 | +2 | +0.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 52 | 36 | +16 | +1.9 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 66 | 54 | +12 | +1.0 |
| Total | 100% | 57 (F) | 41 (F) | +16 | +16.3 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Pinpoint | Willo | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 18 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 9 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Pinpoint has 20 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 18 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; Willo has 14 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 5 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 34 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 20 for Pinpoint, across 2 distinct source domains, and 14 for Willo, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Pinpoint last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Willo last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next