Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
The Predictive Index vs Saville Assessment
The Predictive Index
The Predictive Index provides validated behavioral and cognitive psychometric assessments used to screen, hire, and develop employees and design teams, alongside AI-assisted talent-management software.
Substantial gaps
Assessment
Saville Assessment
Saville Assessment publishes the Wave personality questionnaires, Swift aptitude tests and situational judgment tests. They are scored automatically against norm groups and delivered through the Oasys platform, the Wave Connect hiring platform (which uses AI to build role profiles from job descriptions) and a two-minute Screener that returns a fit band into the employer's ATS.
Substantial gaps
Assessment
The result
The Predictive Index and Saville Assessment tie at 48.
The Predictive Index and Saville Assessment tie at 48 under rubric v1.0 inside the Assessment cohort, arriving there from different criteria. The Predictive Index leads 2 of the 7 criteria and Saville Assessment 2, with 3 level, yet the two totals land on the same number. One criterion, FRIA Support, is both the widest raw gap (The Predictive Index 35, Saville Assessment 40) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 15% weight it makes up 68% of the weighted advantage Saville Assessment holds across the 2 criteria it leads.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- The Predictive Index2
- Saville Assessment2
- Level3
- Widest raw gap
- FRIA Support35 vs 40
- Heaviest weighted swing
- FRIA Support15% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
The Predictive Index and Saville Assessment are both filed under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of
| Record | The Predictive Index | Saville Assessment |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | GB |
| Founded | 1955 | 2004 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
FRIA Support
15% weight33% of the movement so far
The Predictive Index35Saville Assessment400.8 weighted points to Saville Assessment
- 2
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight60% of the movement so far
The Predictive Index43Saville Assessment380.6 weighted points to The Predictive Index
- 3
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight84% of the movement so far
The Predictive Index45Saville Assessment420.5 weighted points to The Predictive Index
- 4
Human Oversight Design
12% weight100% of the movement so far
The Predictive Index52Saville Assessment550.4 weighted points to Saville Assessment
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 4 figures above sum to 0.0 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 2.3 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads 0 beside that 0.0.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is The Predictive Index minus Saville Assessment, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | The Predictive Index | Saville Assessment | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 50 | 50 | - | - |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 45 | 42 | +3 | +0.5 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 40 | -5 | -0.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 55 | 55 | - | - |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 52 | 55 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 43 | 38 | +5 | +0.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 60 | - | - |
| Total | 100% | 48F | 48F | - | 0.0 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | The Predictive Index | Saville Assessment | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 18 | 6 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 34 | 6 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
The Predictive Index has 24 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 18 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Saville Assessment has 40 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 34 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Saville Assessment sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 64 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 24 for The Predictive Index, across 1 distinct source domain, and 40 for Saville Assessment, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- The Predictive Index last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Saville Assessment last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.