Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
The Predictive Index vs Thomas International
The Predictive Index
The Predictive Index provides validated behavioral and cognitive psychometric assessments used to screen, hire, and develop employees and design teams, alongside AI-assisted talent-management software.
Substantial gaps
Assessment
Thomas International
Thomas International provides psychometric and aptitude assessments (behaviour/DISC, cognitive ability, personality and emotional intelligence) with an AI coaching layer, used for hiring, candidate selection and employee development.
Substantial gaps
Assessment
The result
The Predictive Index and Thomas International tie at 48.
The Predictive Index and Thomas International tie at 48 under rubric v1.0 inside the Assessment cohort, arriving there from different criteria. The Predictive Index leads 4 of the 7 criteria and Thomas International 2, with 1 level, yet the two totals land on the same number. One criterion, Article 11 Technical Documentation, is both the widest raw gap (The Predictive Index 50, Thomas International 54) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 20% weight it makes up 73% of the weighted advantage Thomas International holds across the 2 criteria it leads.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- The Predictive Index4
- Thomas International2
- Level1
- Widest raw gap
- Article 11 Technical Documentation50 vs 54
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Article 11 Technical Documentation20% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
The Predictive Index and Thomas International are both filed under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of
| Record | The Predictive Index | Thomas International |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | GB |
| Founded | 1955 | 1981 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight36% of the movement so far
The Predictive Index50Thomas International540.8 weighted points to Thomas International
- 2
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight52% of the movement so far
The Predictive Index45Thomas International430.4 weighted points to The Predictive Index
- 3
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight68% of the movement so far
The Predictive Index43Thomas International400.4 weighted points to The Predictive Index
- 4
FRIA Support
15% weight81% of the movement so far
The Predictive Index35Thomas International330.3 weighted points to The Predictive Index
- 5
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight95% of the movement so far
The Predictive Index55Thomas International570.3 weighted points to Thomas International
- 6
Human Oversight Design
12% weight100% of the movement so far
The Predictive Index52Thomas International510.1 weighted points to The Predictive Index
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to 0.0 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 2.2 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads 0 beside that 0.0.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is The Predictive Index minus Thomas International, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | The Predictive Index | Thomas International | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 50 | 54 | -4 | -0.8 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 45 | 43 | +2 | +0.4 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 33 | +2 | +0.3 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 55 | 57 | -2 | -0.3 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 52 | 51 | +1 | +0.1 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 43 | 40 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 60 | - | - |
| Total | 100% | 48F | 48F | - | 0.0 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | The Predictive Index | Thomas International | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 18 | 6 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 11 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
The Predictive Index has 24 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 18 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Thomas International has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 6 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 41 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 24 for The Predictive Index, across 1 distinct source domain, and 17 for Thomas International, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- The Predictive Index last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Thomas International last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.