§ The result
Workday Recruiting AI leads Pulsifi on all 7 criteria.
Workday Recruiting AI finishes 23 points clear of Pulsifi under rubric v1.0 — 56 against 33 — across the ATS-integrated and Assessment cohorts. Workday Recruiting AI leads every one of the 7 criteria, Pulsifi none of them, and the closest of the 7 is Post-Market Monitoring, Pulsifi 28 to Workday Recruiting AI 35. The advantage Workday Recruiting AI holds is spread out: Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (Pulsifi 30, Workday Recruiting AI 70, 20% weight), yet it supplies only 36% of the weighted points Workday Recruiting AI gains across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Pulsifi
Pulsifi gives candidates and employees 0-100 Role Fit and Organizational Fit scores that combine personality, work-interest, work-culture and cognitive assessments with AI resume and skills analysis, and uses the scores to rank people for hiring, internal mobility and succession.
Vendor profile
Workday Recruiting AI
AI features built into Workday Recruiting, including candidate-skill matching and recruiter productivity tools, surfaced inside the Workday ATS.
§ The record
Pulsifi is filed under Assessment AI, Workday Recruiting AI under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only Pulsifi is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Pulsifi | Workday Recruiting AI |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | SG | US |
| Founded | 2017 | 2005 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 36% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Pulsifi 30 · Workday Recruiting AI 70
8.0 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
18% weight · 68% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Pulsifi 20 · Workday Recruiting AI 60
7.2 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
15% weight · 78% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Pulsifi 40 · Workday Recruiting AI 55
2.3 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
8% weight · 84% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Pulsifi 46 · Workday Recruiting AI 65
1.5 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
15% weight · 91% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Pulsifi 25 · Workday Recruiting AI 35
1.5 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
12% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Pulsifi 55 · Workday Recruiting AI 65
1.2 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Pulsifi 28 · Workday Recruiting AI 35
0.8 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -22.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 22.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -23 beside that -22.5.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Pulsifi minus Workday Recruiting AI.
| Category | Weight | Pulsifi | Workday Recruiting AI | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 30 | 70 | -40 | -8.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 20 | 60 | -40 | -7.2 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 35 | -10 | -1.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 40 | 55 | -15 | -2.3 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 65 | -10 | -1.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 28 | 35 | -7 | -0.8 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 46 | 65 | -19 | -1.5 |
| Total | 100% | 33 (F) | 56 (F) | -23 | -22.5 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Pulsifi | Workday Recruiting AI | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 26 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 9 | 2 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
Pulsifi has 33 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 26 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Workday Recruiting AI has 11 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 2 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 44 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 33 for Pulsifi, across 1 distinct source domain, and 11 for Workday Recruiting AI, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Pulsifi last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Workday Recruiting AI last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next