Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Pymetrics (Harver Games) vs Sapia.ai
Side-by-side scores and evidence under the HireAIScore rubric v1.0. Click a vendor name to jump to the full profile and the cited evidence behind each score.
Vendor profile
Pymetrics (Harver Games)
Behavioral assessment using browser-based "games" that infer cognitive and emotional traits. Acquired by Harver in 2022 and folded into the Harver Games product line.
56
FSubstantial gaps
Vendor profile
Sapia.ai
Structured, text-based chat interview that scores candidates on personality (HEXACO) and competency traits — with no video, audio, or demographic data used.
56
FSubstantial gaps
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Pymetrics (Harver Games) minus Sapia.ai.
| Category | Weight | Pymetrics (Harver Games) | Sapia.ai | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 70 | 70 | — |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 80 | 52 | +28 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 35 | -10 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 60 | 62 | -2 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 50 | 62 | -12 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 35 | 50 | -15 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 55 | 62 | -7 |
| Total | 100% | 56 (F) | 56 (F) | — |
§ Evidence summary
Evidence count
Pymetrics (Harver Games)
11 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 6
- audit report
- 2
- absence
- 2
- public statement
- 1
Evidence count
Sapia.ai
20 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 14
- absence
- 4
- audit report
- 2