HomeCompareRecruitBot vs Test Partnership

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

RecruitBot vs Test Partnership

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

Test Partnership leads RecruitBot by 13 points.

Test Partnership, filed under Assessment, comes out 13 points above RecruitBot, filed under Sourcing: 50 against 37 under rubric v1.0. Test Partnership leads 6 of the 7 criteria, including Article 11 Technical Documentation, while RecruitBot leads 1, including Post-Market Monitoring. The widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing fall on different criteria: Bias Audit Transparency (RecruitBot 22, Test Partnership 48) and Article 11 Technical Documentation at 20% (RecruitBot 33, Test Partnership 57), the second being 35% of the weighted advantage Test Partnership holds across the 6 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

RecruitBot is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Test Partnership under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and NYC LL 144. Only Test Partnership is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.

RecordRecruitBotTest Partnership
Price tierMidMid
HeadquartersUSGB
Founded20172012

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 33% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    RecruitBot 33 · Test Partnership 57

    4.8 weighted points to Test Partnership

  2. 18% weight · 65% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    RecruitBot 22 · Test Partnership 48

    4.7 weighted points to Test Partnership

  3. 15% weight · 74% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    RecruitBot 27 · Test Partnership 36

    1.3 weighted points to Test Partnership

  4. 15% weight · 84% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    RecruitBot 48 · Test Partnership 57

    1.3 weighted points to Test Partnership

  5. 12% weight · 90% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    RecruitBot 50 · Test Partnership 58

    1.0 weighted points to Test Partnership

  6. 12% weight · 96% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    RecruitBot 40 · Test Partnership 33

    0.8 weighted points to RecruitBot

  7. 8% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    RecruitBot 55 · Test Partnership 62

    0.6 weighted points to Test Partnership

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -12.9 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 14.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -13 beside that -12.9.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is RecruitBot minus Test Partnership.

CategoryWeightRecruitBotTest PartnershipΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%3357-24-4.8
Bias Audit Transparency18%2248-26-4.7
FRIA Support15%2736-9-1.3
Data Governance Disclosure15%4857-9-1.3
Human Oversight Design12%5058-8-1.0
Post-Market Monitoring12%4033+7+0.8
Customer Documentation8%5562-7-0.6
Total100%37 (F)50 (F)-13-12.9

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightRecruitBotTest Partnership
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%41Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%31—31Sources on the vendor's own domain
FRIA Support15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%60Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Human Oversight Design12%31Sources on the vendor's own domain50Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%41Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%41Sources on the vendor's own domain51Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
All criteria100%256Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain266Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

RecruitBot has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Test Partnership has 32 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 26 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for RecruitBot and Test Partnership sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 63 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 31 for RecruitBot, across 2 distinct source domains, and 32 for Test Partnership, across 3 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
RecruitBot last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Test Partnership last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.