Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Ribbon vs Wonderlic
Ribbon
Ribbon is an AI recruiter that runs voice and video screening interviews with applicants around the clock, scores each interview against default and custom rubrics, ranks candidates for recruiter review, and syncs the results to 60+ applicant tracking systems.
Substantial gaps
Screening
Wonderlic
Wonderlic Select (formerly WonScore) is a pre-employment assessment that combines cognitive ability, personality, and motivation tests to score and rank candidates for job fit.
Substantial gaps
Assessment
The result
Ribbon and Wonderlic tie at 43.
Ribbon, filed under Screening, and Wonderlic, filed under Assessment, tie at 43 under rubric v1.0 by different routes through the criteria. Ribbon leads 5 of the 7 criteria and Wonderlic 2, yet the two totals land on the same number. Wonderlic takes the heaviest weighted swing, Article 11 Technical Documentation at 20% (Ribbon 42, Wonderlic 52), which is 53% of the weighted advantage Wonderlic holds; the widest raw gap is a different criterion, Data Governance Disclosure, Ribbon 50 to Wonderlic 38.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Ribbon5
- Wonderlic2
- Widest raw gap
- Data Governance Disclosure50 vs 38
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Article 11 Technical Documentation20% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Ribbon is filed under Screening AI, Wonderlic under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
| Record | Ribbon | Wonderlic |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Low | Mid |
| Headquarters | CA | US |
| Founded | 2020 | 1937 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight25% of the movement so far
Ribbon42Wonderlic522.0 weighted points to Wonderlic
- 2
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight48% of the movement so far
Ribbon38Wonderlic481.8 weighted points to Wonderlic
- 3
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight71% of the movement so far
Ribbon50Wonderlic381.8 weighted points to Ribbon
- 4
FRIA Support
15% weight86% of the movement so far
Ribbon33Wonderlic251.2 weighted points to Ribbon
- 5
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight92% of the movement so far
Ribbon37Wonderlic330.5 weighted points to Ribbon
- 6
Human Oversight Design
12% weight97% of the movement so far
Ribbon55Wonderlic520.4 weighted points to Ribbon
- 7
Customer Documentation
8% weight100% of the movement so far
Ribbon58Wonderlic550.2 weighted points to Ribbon
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +0.3 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 7.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads 0 beside that +0.3.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Ribbon minus Wonderlic, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Ribbon | Wonderlic | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 42 | 52 | -10 | -2.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 38 | 48 | -10 | -1.8 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 33 | 25 | +8 | +1.2 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 50 | 38 | +12 | +1.8 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 52 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 37 | 33 | +4 | +0.5 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 58 | 55 | +3 | +0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 43F | 43F | - | +0.3 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Ribbon | Wonderlic | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 31 | 4 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 9 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Ribbon has 35 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 31 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; Wonderlic has 15 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Ribbon sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 50 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 35 for Ribbon, across 2 distinct source domains, and 15 for Wonderlic, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Ribbon last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Wonderlic last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.