The result

Saville Assessment and Sova Assessment tie at 48.

Saville Assessment and Sova Assessment tie at 48 under rubric v1.0 inside the Assessment cohort, arriving there from different criteria. Saville Assessment leads 2 of the 7 criteria and Sova Assessment 3, with 2 level, yet the two totals land on the same number. One criterion, Article 11 Technical Documentation, is both the widest raw gap (Saville Assessment 50, Sova Assessment 55) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 20% weight it makes up 71% of the weighted advantage Sova Assessment holds across the 3 criteria it leads.

Criteria won

7 criteria

  • Saville Assessment2
  • Sova Assessment3
  • Level2
Widest raw gap
Article 11 Technical Documentation50 vs 55
Heaviest weighted swing
Article 11 Technical Documentation20% weight

Keep this comparison

Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.

Sent once, with links to turn on alerts for either vendor. No list.

The record

Categories, scope and company facts.

Saville Assessment and Sova Assessment are both filed under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

RecordSaville AssessmentSova Assessment
Price tierEnterpriseHigh
HeadquartersGBGB
Founded20042015

What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. Article 11 Technical Documentation

    20% weight39% of the movement so far

    Saville Assessment50
    Sova Assessment55

    1.0 weighted points to Sova Assessment

  2. Bias Audit Transparency

    18% weight67% of the movement so far

    Saville Assessment42
    Sova Assessment38

    0.7 weighted points to Saville Assessment

  3. Data Governance Disclosure

    15% weight84% of the movement so far

    Saville Assessment55
    Sova Assessment52

    0.4 weighted points to Saville Assessment

  4. Post-Market Monitoring

    12% weight94% of the movement so far

    Saville Assessment38
    Sova Assessment40

    0.2 weighted points to Sova Assessment

  5. Customer Documentation

    8% weight100% of the movement so far

    Saville Assessment60
    Sova Assessment62

    0.2 weighted points to Sova Assessment

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 5 figures above sum to -0.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 2.6 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads 0 beside that -0.2.

Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Saville Assessment minus Sova Assessment, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.

CategoryWeightSaville AssessmentSova AssessmentΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%5055-5-1.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%4238+4+0.7
FRIA Support15%4040--
Data Governance Disclosure15%5552+3+0.4
Human Oversight Design12%5555--
Post-Market Monitoring12%3840-2-0.2
Customer Documentation8%6062-2-0.2
Total100%48F48F--0.2

Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightSaville AssessmentSova Assessment
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%51Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%41Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain42Sources on the vendor's own domain
FRIA Support15%31Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%51Sources on the vendor's own domain41Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Human Oversight Design12%60Sources on the vendor's own domain51Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%51Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Customer Documentation8%61Sources on the vendor's own domain61Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
All criteria100%346Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain288Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Saville Assessment has 40 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 34 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Sova Assessment has 34 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 28 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Saville Assessment and Sova Assessment sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 74 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 40 for Saville Assessment, across 2 distinct source domains, and 34 for Sova Assessment, across 3 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Saville Assessment last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Sova Assessment last reviewed
August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.

Where next