HomeCompareSaville Assessment vs Willo

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Saville Assessment vs Willo

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

Saville Assessment leads Willo by 7 points.

Under rubric v1.0, Saville Assessment, filed under Assessment, finishes on 48 and Willo, filed under Video interview, on 41, 7 points apart. Willo takes 1 of the 7 criteria, Human Oversight Design among them, against 6 for Saville Assessment, whose share includes Article 11 Technical Documentation. The widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing fall on different criteria: FRIA Support (Saville Assessment 40, Willo 25) and Article 11 Technical Documentation at 20% (Saville Assessment 50, Willo 38), the second being 31% of the weighted advantage Saville Assessment holds across the 6 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Saville Assessment is filed under Assessment AI, Willo under Video interview AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.

RecordSaville AssessmentWillo
Price tierEnterpriseLow
HeadquartersGBGB
Founded20042018

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 28% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Saville Assessment 50 · Willo 38

    2.4 weighted points to Saville Assessment

  2. 15% weight · 54% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Saville Assessment 40 · Willo 25

    2.3 weighted points to Saville Assessment

  3. 18% weight · 79% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Saville Assessment 42 · Willo 30

    2.2 weighted points to Saville Assessment

  4. 12% weight · 88% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Saville Assessment 55 · Willo 62

    0.8 weighted points to Willo

  5. 8% weight · 94% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Saville Assessment 60 · Willo 54

    0.5 weighted points to Saville Assessment

  6. 15% weight · 97% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Saville Assessment 55 · Willo 53

    0.3 weighted points to Saville Assessment

  7. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Saville Assessment 38 · Willo 36

    0.2 weighted points to Saville Assessment

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +7.0 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 8.7 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +7 beside that +7.0.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Saville Assessment minus Willo.

CategoryWeightSaville AssessmentWilloΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%5038+12+2.4
Bias Audit Transparency18%4230+12+2.2
FRIA Support15%4025+15+2.3
Data Governance Disclosure15%5553+2+0.3
Human Oversight Design12%5562-7-0.8
Post-Market Monitoring12%3836+2+0.2
Customer Documentation8%6054+6+0.5
Total100%48 (F)41 (F)+7+7.0

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightSaville AssessmentWillo
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%51Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%41Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain11—
FRIA Support15%31Sources on the vendor's own domain01—
Data Governance Disclosure15%51Sources on the vendor's own domain20Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%60Sources on the vendor's own domain20Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%51Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%61Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%346Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain95Sources on the vendor's own domain

Saville Assessment has 40 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 34 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Willo has 14 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Saville Assessment sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 54 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 40 for Saville Assessment, across 2 distinct source domains, and 14 for Willo, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
Saville Assessment last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Willo last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.