HomeCompareSeekOut vs Talview

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

SeekOut vs Talview

Export comparison (CSV)Pro

§ The result

Talview leads SeekOut by 8 points.

Talview scores 42 and SeekOut 34 under rubric v1.0, an 8-point gap across the Video interview and Sourcing cohorts. Talview leads 5 of the 7 criteria, including Article 11 Technical Documentation, while SeekOut leads 1, including Bias Audit Transparency, and 1 is level. The widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing fall on different criteria: Customer Documentation (SeekOut 35, Talview 52) and Article 11 Technical Documentation at 20% (SeekOut 35, Talview 50), the second being 36% of the weighted advantage Talview holds across the 5 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

SeekOut is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Talview under Video interview AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and NYC LL 144. Only Talview is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.

RecordSeekOutTalview
Price tierEnterpriseEnterprise
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded20172012

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 34% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    SeekOut 35 · Talview 50

    3.0 weighted points to Talview

  2. 15% weight · 57% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    SeekOut 35 · Talview 48

    1.9 weighted points to Talview

  3. 8% weight · 72% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    SeekOut 35 · Talview 52

    1.4 weighted points to Talview

  4. 12% weight · 86% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    SeekOut 45 · Talview 55

    1.2 weighted points to Talview

  5. 12% weight · 96% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    SeekOut 25 · Talview 32

    0.8 weighted points to Talview

  6. 18% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    SeekOut 40 · Talview 38

    0.4 weighted points to SeekOut

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to -8.0 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 8.7 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -8 beside that -8.0.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is SeekOut minus Talview.

CategoryWeightSeekOutTalviewΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%3550-15-3.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%4038+2+0.4
FRIA Support15%2525--
Data Governance Disclosure15%3548-13-1.9
Human Oversight Design12%4555-10-1.2
Post-Market Monitoring12%2532-7-0.8
Customer Documentation8%3552-17-1.4
Total100%34 (F)42 (F)-8-8.0

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightSeekOutTalview
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%11Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%1111
FRIA Support15%0101
Data Governance Disclosure15%10Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%10Sources on the vendor's own domain20Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%0111Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%10Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%54Sources on the vendor's own domain116Sources on the vendor's own domain

SeekOut has 9 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 5 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; Talview has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 6 documented absences.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 26 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 9 for SeekOut, across 1 distinct source domain, and 17 for Talview, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
SeekOut last reviewed
May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Talview last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.