HomeCompareSmartRecruiters vs Testlify

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

SmartRecruiters vs Testlify

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

SmartRecruiters leads Testlify on all 7 criteria.

SmartRecruiters finishes 17 points clear of Testlify under rubric v1.0 — 62 (D) against 45 (F) — across the ATS-integrated and Assessment cohorts. Of the 7 criteria Testlify wins none, and the narrowest lead SmartRecruiters holds is on Customer Documentation, SmartRecruiters 63 to Testlify 60. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (SmartRecruiters 78, Testlify 30) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 51% of the weighted advantage SmartRecruiters holds across the 7 criteria it leads.

§ The record

SmartRecruiters is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Testlify under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only Testlify is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordSmartRecruitersTestlify
Price tierEnterpriseLow
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded20102022

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 51% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    SmartRecruiters 78 · Testlify 30

    8.6 weighted points to SmartRecruiters

  2. 20% weight · 72% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    SmartRecruiters 70 · Testlify 52

    3.6 weighted points to SmartRecruiters

  3. 15% weight · 83% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    SmartRecruiters 45 · Testlify 33

    1.8 weighted points to SmartRecruiters

  4. 15% weight · 89% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    SmartRecruiters 62 · Testlify 55

    1.1 weighted points to SmartRecruiters

  5. 12% weight · 94% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    SmartRecruiters 62 · Testlify 55

    0.8 weighted points to SmartRecruiters

  6. 12% weight · 99% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    SmartRecruiters 48 · Testlify 42

    0.7 weighted points to SmartRecruiters

  7. 8% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    SmartRecruiters 63 · Testlify 60

    0.2 weighted points to SmartRecruiters

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +16.9 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 16.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +17 beside that +16.9.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is SmartRecruiters minus Testlify.

CategoryWeightSmartRecruitersTestlifyΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%7052+18+3.6
Bias Audit Transparency18%7830+48+8.6
FRIA Support15%4533+12+1.8
Data Governance Disclosure15%6255+7+1.1
Human Oversight Design12%6255+7+0.8
Post-Market Monitoring12%4842+6+0.7
Customer Documentation8%6360+3+0.2
Total100%62 (D)45 (F)+17+16.9

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightSmartRecruitersTestlify
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%20Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%10Audit reportSources on a separate domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
FRIA Support15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%20Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain60Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%20Sources on the vendor's own domain60Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%11Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain51Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%20Sources on the vendor's own domain51Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%112Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain315Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain

SmartRecruiters has 13 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; Testlify has 36 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 31 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for SmartRecruiters sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 49 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 13 for SmartRecruiters, across 2 distinct source domains, and 36 for Testlify, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
SmartRecruiters last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Testlify last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.