§ The result
Workday Recruiting AI leads Talogy on all 7 criteria.
Workday Recruiting AI sits 14 points above Talogy under rubric v1.0 — 56 against 42 — with Workday Recruiting AI filed under ATS-integrated and Talogy under Assessment. Workday Recruiting AI leads every one of the 7 criteria, Talogy none of them, and the closest of the 7 is Data Governance Disclosure, Talogy 52 to Workday Recruiting AI 55. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Talogy 30, Workday Recruiting AI 60 — and at an 18% weight it carries 41% of the weighted advantage Workday Recruiting AI holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Talogy
Talogy sells psychometric talent-assessment products - cognitive ability tests (Logiks, Mindgage), personality inventories (Caliper, P.A.P.I.), values-based screening, situational judgement and job simulations, and 360 feedback - delivered through its TalogyTech platform for candidate selection and employee development.
Vendor profile
Workday Recruiting AI
AI features built into Workday Recruiting, including candidate-skill matching and recruiter productivity tools, surfaced inside the Workday ATS.
§ The record
Talogy is filed under Assessment AI, Workday Recruiting AI under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only Talogy is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Talogy | Workday Recruiting AI |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 1946 | 2005 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 41% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Talogy 30 · Workday Recruiting AI 60
5.4 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
20% weight · 67% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Talogy 53 · Workday Recruiting AI 70
3.4 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
12% weight · 78% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Talogy 52 · Workday Recruiting AI 65
1.6 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
15% weight · 90% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Talogy 25 · Workday Recruiting AI 35
1.5 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
8% weight · 94% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Talogy 58 · Workday Recruiting AI 65
0.6 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
15% weight · 97% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Talogy 52 · Workday Recruiting AI 55
0.4 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Talogy 32 · Workday Recruiting AI 35
0.4 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -13.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 13.2 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -14 beside that -13.2.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Talogy minus Workday Recruiting AI.
| Category | Weight | Talogy | Workday Recruiting AI | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 53 | 70 | -17 | -3.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 30 | 60 | -30 | -5.4 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 35 | -10 | -1.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 52 | 55 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 52 | 65 | -13 | -1.6 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 32 | 35 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 58 | 65 | -7 | -0.6 |
| Total | 100% | 42 (F) | 56 (F) | -14 | -13.2 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Talogy | Workday Recruiting AI | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 22 | 9 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 9 | 2 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
Talogy has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 22 with a source URL, 9 documented absences; Workday Recruiting AI has 11 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 2 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 39 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 28 for Talogy, across 1 distinct source domain, and 11 for Workday Recruiting AI, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Talogy last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Workday Recruiting AI last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next