§ The result
Teamtailor leads Talview by 5 points.
Teamtailor scores 47 and Talview 42 under rubric v1.0, a 5-point gap across the ATS-integrated and Video interview cohorts. Teamtailor leads 4 of the 7 criteria, including FRIA Support, while Talview leads 2, including Bias Audit Transparency, and 1 is level. FRIA Support is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Talview 25, Teamtailor 42 — and at a 15% weight it carries 42% of the weighted advantage Teamtailor holds across the 4 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Talview
AI-powered hiring and exam-integrity platform spanning video interviewing, skills assessments, identity verification, and AI proctoring.
Vendor profile
Teamtailor
Teamtailor is a Stockholm-based applicant tracking and employer-branding platform whose OpenAI-powered "Co-pilot" assists recruiters with candidate screening, resume and interview summaries, talent-pool matching, interview-question generation, and AI-assisted job-ad and content writing.
§ The record
Talview is filed under Video interview AI, Teamtailor under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Illinois HB 3773 and Colorado AI Act. Only Talview is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Talview | Teamtailor |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | SE |
| Founded | 2012 | 2013 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
15% weight · 34% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Talview 25 · Teamtailor 42
2.5 weighted points to Teamtailor
15% weight · 53% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Talview 48 · Teamtailor 58
1.5 weighted points to Teamtailor
18% weight · 72% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Talview 38 · Teamtailor 30
1.4 weighted points to Talview
12% weight · 88% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Talview 32 · Teamtailor 42
1.2 weighted points to Teamtailor
8% weight · 98% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Talview 52 · Teamtailor 62
0.8 weighted points to Teamtailor
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Talview 55 · Teamtailor 54
0.1 weighted points to Talview
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to -4.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 7.6 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -5 beside that -4.5.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Talview minus Teamtailor.
| Category | Weight | Talview | Teamtailor | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 50 | 50 | - | - |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 38 | 30 | +8 | +1.4 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 42 | -17 | -2.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 48 | 58 | -10 | -1.5 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 54 | +1 | +0.1 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 32 | 42 | -10 | -1.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 52 | 62 | -10 | -0.8 |
| Total | 100% | 42 (F) | 47 (F) | -5 | -4.5 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Talview | Teamtailor | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 0 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 11 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 14 | 6 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
Talview has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Teamtailor has 20 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 14 with a source URL, 6 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 37 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 17 for Talview, across 1 distinct source domain, and 20 for Teamtailor, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Talview last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Teamtailor last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next