§ The result
Tribepad leads TestDome by 19 points.
Under rubric v1.0, Tribepad (ATS-integrated) opens a 19-point lead on TestDome (Assessment), 56 to 37. The 7 criteria split 6 to 1 in favour of Tribepad: Tribepad is ahead on Bias Audit Transparency and TestDome on Customer Documentation. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — TestDome 15, Tribepad 78 — and at an 18% weight it carries 59% of the weighted advantage Tribepad holds across the 6 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
TestDome
TestDome sells pay-per-candidate online skills tests for coding, Excel and more than 100 other skills. The tests are scored automatically, and open-ended answers can be scored by AI. AI analysis of webcam and screen proctoring recordings flags possible cheating, and a live code-interview tool is included.
Vendor profile
Tribepad
Tribepad is a UK applicant tracking system whose built-in Sidekick AI assistant scores and ranks applicants against recruiter-weighted skills and generates candidate summaries, SWOT analyses, job descriptions, salary suggestions and interview questions.
§ The record
TestDome is filed under Assessment AI, Tribepad under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only TestDome is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | TestDome | Tribepad |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Low | Mid |
| Headquarters | HR | GB |
| Founded | 2013 | 2008 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 58% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
TestDome 15 · Tribepad 78
11.3 weighted points to Tribepad
20% weight · 75% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
TestDome 40 · Tribepad 56
3.2 weighted points to Tribepad
12% weight · 89% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
TestDome 30 · Tribepad 54
2.9 weighted points to Tribepad
15% weight · 94% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
TestDome 50 · Tribepad 56
0.9 weighted points to Tribepad
12% weight · 98% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
TestDome 52 · Tribepad 58
0.7 weighted points to Tribepad
15% weight · 99% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
TestDome 28 · Tribepad 30
0.3 weighted points to Tribepad
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
TestDome 60 · Tribepad 58
0.2 weighted points to TestDome
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -19.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 19.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -19 beside that -19.2.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is TestDome minus Tribepad.
| Category | Weight | TestDome | Tribepad | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 40 | 56 | -16 | -3.2 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 15 | 78 | -63 | -11.3 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 28 | 30 | -2 | -0.3 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 50 | 56 | -6 | -0.9 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 52 | 58 | -6 | -0.7 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 54 | -24 | -2.9 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 58 | +2 | +0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 37 (F) | 56 (F) | -19 | -19.2 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | TestDome | Tribepad | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | — | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | — | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 27 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 28 | 4 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
TestDome has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 27 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Tribepad has 32 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 28 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Tribepad sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 63 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 31 for TestDome, across 1 distinct source domain, and 32 for Tribepad, across 3 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- TestDome last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Tribepad last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next