§ The result
Workday Recruiting AI leads TestDome on all 7 criteria.
Under rubric v1.0, Workday Recruiting AI (ATS-integrated) opens a 19-point lead on TestDome (Assessment), 56 to 37. Workday Recruiting AI takes all 7 criteria and TestDome none of them; the nearest contest is Data Governance Disclosure, TestDome 50 to Workday Recruiting AI 55. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — TestDome 15, Workday Recruiting AI 60 — and at an 18% weight it carries 44% of the weighted advantage Workday Recruiting AI holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
TestDome
TestDome sells pay-per-candidate online skills tests for coding, Excel and more than 100 other skills. The tests are scored automatically, and open-ended answers can be scored by AI. AI analysis of webcam and screen proctoring recordings flags possible cheating, and a live code-interview tool is included.
Vendor profile
Workday Recruiting AI
AI features built into Workday Recruiting, including candidate-skill matching and recruiter productivity tools, surfaced inside the Workday ATS.
§ The record
TestDome is filed under Assessment AI, Workday Recruiting AI under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only TestDome is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | TestDome | Workday Recruiting AI |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Low | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | HR | US |
| Founded | 2013 | 2005 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 44% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
TestDome 15 · Workday Recruiting AI 60
8.1 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
20% weight · 76% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
TestDome 40 · Workday Recruiting AI 70
6.0 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
12% weight · 85% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
TestDome 52 · Workday Recruiting AI 65
1.6 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
15% weight · 91% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
TestDome 28 · Workday Recruiting AI 35
1.1 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
15% weight · 95% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
TestDome 50 · Workday Recruiting AI 55
0.8 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
12% weight · 98% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
TestDome 30 · Workday Recruiting AI 35
0.6 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
TestDome 60 · Workday Recruiting AI 65
0.4 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -18.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 18.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -19 beside that -18.5.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is TestDome minus Workday Recruiting AI.
| Category | Weight | TestDome | Workday Recruiting AI | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 40 | 70 | -30 | -6.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 15 | 60 | -45 | -8.1 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 28 | 35 | -7 | -1.1 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 50 | 55 | -5 | -0.8 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 52 | 65 | -13 | -1.6 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 35 | -5 | -0.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 65 | -5 | -0.4 |
| Total | 100% | 37 (F) | 56 (F) | -19 | -18.5 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | TestDome | Workday Recruiting AI | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 27 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 9 | 2 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
TestDome has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 27 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Workday Recruiting AI has 11 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 2 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 42 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 31 for TestDome, across 1 distinct source domain, and 11 for Workday Recruiting AI, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- TestDome last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Workday Recruiting AI last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next