§ The result
Workday Recruiting AI leads Testlify by 11 points.
Workday Recruiting AI sits 11 points above Testlify under rubric v1.0 — 56 against 45 — with Workday Recruiting AI filed under ATS-integrated and Testlify under Assessment. Workday Recruiting AI leads 5 of the 7 criteria, including Bias Audit Transparency, while Testlify leads 1, including Post-Market Monitoring, and 1 is level. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (Testlify 30, Workday Recruiting AI 60) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 50% of the weighted advantage Workday Recruiting AI holds across the 5 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Testlify
Testlify is a skills-assessment and AI-interviewing platform that ranks candidates on a scored leaderboard from pre-built or AI-generated tests, with an AI résumé screener, AI-scored video, voice and chat interviews, and AI-assisted proctoring.
Vendor profile
Workday Recruiting AI
AI features built into Workday Recruiting, including candidate-skill matching and recruiter productivity tools, surfaced inside the Workday ATS.
§ The record
Testlify is filed under Assessment AI, Workday Recruiting AI under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only Testlify is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Testlify | Workday Recruiting AI |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Low | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2022 | 2005 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 46% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Testlify 30 · Workday Recruiting AI 60
5.4 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
20% weight · 77% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Testlify 52 · Workday Recruiting AI 70
3.6 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
12% weight · 87% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Testlify 55 · Workday Recruiting AI 65
1.2 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
12% weight · 94% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Testlify 42 · Workday Recruiting AI 35
0.8 weighted points to Testlify
8% weight · 97% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Testlify 60 · Workday Recruiting AI 65
0.4 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Testlify 33 · Workday Recruiting AI 35
0.3 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to -10.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 11.7 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -11 beside that -10.1.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Testlify minus Workday Recruiting AI.
| Category | Weight | Testlify | Workday Recruiting AI | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 52 | 70 | -18 | -3.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 30 | 60 | -30 | -5.4 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 33 | 35 | -2 | -0.3 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 55 | 55 | - | - |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 65 | -10 | -1.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 42 | 35 | +7 | +0.8 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 65 | -5 | -0.4 |
| Total | 100% | 45 (F) | 56 (F) | -11 | -10.1 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Testlify | Workday Recruiting AI | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 6 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 31 | 5 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 9 | 2 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
Testlify has 36 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 31 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Workday Recruiting AI has 11 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 2 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 47 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 36 for Testlify, across 1 distinct source domain, and 11 for Workday Recruiting AI, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Testlify last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Workday Recruiting AI last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next