The result

Wellfound takes the total, Textkernel takes more of the criteria.

Wellfound holds a 1-point edge over Textkernel under rubric v1.0, 52 to 51, across the Screening and Sourcing cohorts. Textkernel leads more of the criteria, 5 against 2 for Wellfound, yet Wellfound takes Bias Audit Transparency, which carries 18% of the rubric, and the weighted sum with it. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Textkernel 55, Wellfound 82 — and at an 18% weight it carries 67% of the weighted advantage Wellfound holds across the 2 criteria on that side of the table.

Criteria won

7 criteria

  • Textkernel5
  • Wellfound2
Widest raw gap
Bias Audit Transparency55 vs 82
Heaviest weighted swing
Bias Audit Transparency18% weight

Keep this comparison

Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.

Sent once, with links to turn on alerts for either vendor. No list.

The record

Categories, scope and company facts.

Textkernel is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Wellfound under Screening AI. They also share 1 secondary category: ATS-integrated.

RecordTextkernelWellfound
Price tierEnterpriseMid
HeadquartersNLUS
Founded20012012

What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. Bias Audit Transparency

    18% weight36% of the movement so far

    Textkernel55
    Wellfound82

    4.9 weighted points to Wellfound

  2. Article 11 Technical Documentation

    20% weight58% of the movement so far

    Textkernel55
    Wellfound40

    3.0 weighted points to Textkernel

  3. Post-Market Monitoring

    12% weight75% of the movement so far

    Textkernel40
    Wellfound60

    2.4 weighted points to Wellfound

  4. Data Governance Disclosure

    15% weight86% of the movement so far

    Textkernel55
    Wellfound45

    1.5 weighted points to Textkernel

  5. Human Oversight Design

    12% weight93% of the movement so far

    Textkernel60
    Wellfound52

    1.0 weighted points to Textkernel

  6. FRIA Support

    15% weight98% of the movement so far

    Textkernel32
    Wellfound28

    0.6 weighted points to Textkernel

  7. Customer Documentation

    8% weight100% of the movement so far

    Textkernel62
    Wellfound58

    0.3 weighted points to Textkernel

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -0.9 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 13.6 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -1 beside that -0.9.

Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Textkernel minus Wellfound, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.

CategoryWeightTextkernelWellfoundΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%5540+15+3.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%5582-27-4.9
FRIA Support15%3228+4+0.6
Data Governance Disclosure15%5545+10+1.5
Human Oversight Design12%6052+8+1.0
Post-Market Monitoring12%4060-20-2.4
Customer Documentation8%6258+4+0.3
Total100%51F52F-1-0.9

Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightTextkernelWellfound
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%21Sources on the vendor's own domain22Sources on a separate domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%21Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain50Audit reportSources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%11—12—
Data Governance Disclosure15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain32Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%30Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%11Sources on the vendor's own domain31Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Customer Documentation8%30Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%135Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain229Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Textkernel has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 13 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Wellfound has 27 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 22 with a source URL, 9 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Wellfound sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 45 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 18 for Textkernel, across 1 distinct source domain, and 27 for Wellfound, across 3 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Textkernel last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Wellfound last reviewed
August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.

Where next