Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Toggl Hire vs Turing
Toggl Hire
Toggl Hire is a skills-first hiring platform (now being retired) that screens candidates with auto-graded skills tests, async video interviews and homework assignments, bundled with a lightweight ATS.
Substantial gaps
Assessment
Turing
Turing is an AI-powered talent platform that vets software engineers through automated multi-stage technical assessments and uses machine-learned ranking to score, match, and place them with client companies.
Substantial gaps
Assessment
The result
1 point separates Toggl Hire and Turing.
Within the Assessment cohort, Toggl Hire edges Turing by 1 point under rubric v1.0, 37 to 36. The 7 criteria split 5 to 2 in favour of Toggl Hire: Toggl Hire is ahead on Data Governance Disclosure and Turing on Article 11 Technical Documentation. The widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing are the same criterion, Article 11 Technical Documentation, and Turing holds it (Toggl Hire 30, Turing 42, 20% weight), worth 63% of the weighted advantage Turing builds across the 2 criteria it leads.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Toggl Hire5
- Turing2
- Widest raw gap
- Article 11 Technical Documentation30 vs 42
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Article 11 Technical Documentation20% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Toggl Hire and Turing are both filed under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
| Record | Toggl Hire | Turing |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Low | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | EE | US |
| Founded | 2013 | 2018 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight29% of the movement so far
Toggl Hire30Turing422.4 weighted points to Turing
- 2
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight49% of the movement so far
Toggl Hire55Turing441.6 weighted points to Toggl Hire
- 3
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight67% of the movement so far
Toggl Hire20Turing281.4 weighted points to Turing
- 4
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight79% of the movement so far
Toggl Hire35Turing271.0 weighted points to Toggl Hire
- 5
Human Oversight Design
12% weight89% of the movement so far
Toggl Hire52Turing450.8 weighted points to Toggl Hire
- 6
FRIA Support
15% weight98% of the movement so far
Toggl Hire30Turing250.8 weighted points to Toggl Hire
- 7
Customer Documentation
8% weight100% of the movement so far
Toggl Hire50Turing480.2 weighted points to Toggl Hire
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +0.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 8.2 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +1 beside that +0.5.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Toggl Hire minus Turing, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Toggl Hire | Turing | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 30 | 42 | -12 | -2.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 20 | 28 | -8 | -1.4 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 25 | +5 | +0.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 55 | 44 | +11 | +1.6 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 52 | 45 | +7 | +0.8 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 35 | 27 | +8 | +1.0 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 50 | 48 | +2 | +0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 37F | 36F | +1 | +0.5 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Toggl Hire | Turing | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 0 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 10 | 4 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 8 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Toggl Hire has 14 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 10 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; Turing has 14 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 8 with a source URL, 7 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 28 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 14 for Toggl Hire, across 1 distinct source domain, and 14 for Turing, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Toggl Hire last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Turing last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
Where next
Scored against