§ The result
4 points separate Willo and Toggl Hire.
Willo (Video interview) edges Toggl Hire (Assessment) by 4 points under rubric v1.0, 41 to 37. Willo leads 5 of the 7 criteria, including Bias Audit Transparency, while Toggl Hire leads 2, including FRIA Support. Bias Audit Transparency is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (Toggl Hire 20, Willo 30, 18% weight), but it accounts for only 36% of the weighted advantage Willo holds across the 5 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Toggl Hire
Toggl Hire is a skills-first hiring platform (now being retired) that screens candidates with auto-graded skills tests, async video interviews and homework assignments, bundled with a lightweight ATS.
Vendor profile
Willo
Willo is a browser-based asynchronous (one-way) video interview platform that lets employers collect recorded video, audio, multiple-choice and written candidate responses, then uses AI to transcribe, summarize, rank candidates against employer-defined "Blueprint" criteria, and flag scripted or AI-generated answers.
§ The record
Toggl Hire is filed under Assessment AI, Willo under Video interview AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Toggl Hire | Willo |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Low | Low |
| Headquarters | EE | GB |
| Founded | 2013 | 2018 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 30% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Toggl Hire 20 · Willo 30
1.8 weighted points to Willo
20% weight · 56% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Toggl Hire 30 · Willo 38
1.6 weighted points to Willo
12% weight · 76% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Toggl Hire 52 · Willo 62
1.2 weighted points to Willo
15% weight · 88% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Toggl Hire 30 · Willo 25
0.8 weighted points to Toggl Hire
8% weight · 93% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Toggl Hire 50 · Willo 54
0.3 weighted points to Willo
15% weight · 98% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Toggl Hire 55 · Willo 53
0.3 weighted points to Toggl Hire
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Toggl Hire 35 · Willo 36
0.1 weighted points to Willo
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -4.0 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 6.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -4 beside that -4.0.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Toggl Hire minus Willo.
| Category | Weight | Toggl Hire | Willo | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 30 | 38 | -8 | -1.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 20 | 30 | -10 | -1.8 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 25 | +5 | +0.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 55 | 53 | +2 | +0.3 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 52 | 62 | -10 | -1.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 35 | 36 | -1 | -0.1 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 50 | 54 | -4 | -0.3 |
| Total | 100% | 37 (F) | 41 (F) | -4 | -4.0 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Toggl Hire | Willo | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 0 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 10 | 4 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 9 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Toggl Hire has 14 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 10 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; Willo has 14 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 5 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 28 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 14 for Toggl Hire, across 1 distinct source domain, and 14 for Willo, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Toggl Hire last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Willo last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next