HomeCompareVervoe vs Willo

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Vervoe vs Willo

Export comparison (CSV)Pro

§ The result

Vervoe leads Willo by 5 points.

Vervoe scores 46 and Willo 41 under rubric v1.0, a 5-point gap across the Assessment and Video interview cohorts. Vervoe leads 4 of the 7 criteria, including Bias Audit Transparency, while Willo leads 2, including Post-Market Monitoring, and 1 is level. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Vervoe 52, Willo 30 — and at an 18% weight it carries 66% of the weighted advantage Vervoe holds across the 4 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Vervoe is filed under Assessment AI, Willo under Video interview AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.

RecordVervoeWillo
Price tierMidLow
HeadquartersAUGB
Founded20162018

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 55% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Vervoe 52 · Willo 30

    4.0 weighted points to Vervoe

  2. 20% weight · 75% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Vervoe 45 · Willo 38

    1.4 weighted points to Vervoe

  3. 12% weight · 88% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Vervoe 28 · Willo 36

    1.0 weighted points to Willo

  4. 8% weight · 92% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Vervoe 58 · Willo 54

    0.3 weighted points to Vervoe

  5. 15% weight · 97% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Vervoe 55 · Willo 53

    0.3 weighted points to Vervoe

  6. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Vervoe 60 · Willo 62

    0.2 weighted points to Willo

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +4.8 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 7.2 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +5 beside that +4.8.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Vervoe minus Willo.

CategoryWeightVervoeWilloΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%4538+7+1.4
Bias Audit Transparency18%5230+22+4.0
FRIA Support15%2525--
Data Governance Disclosure15%5553+2+0.3
Human Oversight Design12%6062-2-0.2
Post-Market Monitoring12%2836-8-1.0
Customer Documentation8%5854+4+0.3
Total100%46 (F)41 (F)+5+4.8

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightVervoeWillo
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%21Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%21Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain11
FRIA Support15%0101
Data Governance Disclosure15%40Sources on the vendor's own domain20Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%30Sources on the vendor's own domain20Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%1111Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%31Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%155Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain95Sources on the vendor's own domain

Vervoe has 20 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 15 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Willo has 14 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 5 documented absences.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 34 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 20 for Vervoe, across 1 distinct source domain, and 14 for Willo, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
Vervoe last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Willo last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.