§ The result
Workday Recruiting AI leads Willo by 15 points.
Workday Recruiting AI finishes 15 points clear of Willo under rubric v1.0 — 56 against 41 — across the ATS-integrated and Video interview cohorts. Workday Recruiting AI leads 6 of the 7 criteria, including Article 11 Technical Documentation, while Willo leads 1, including Post-Market Monitoring. Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Willo 38, Workday Recruiting AI 70 — and at a 20% weight it carries 43% of the weighted advantage Workday Recruiting AI holds across the 6 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Willo
Willo is a browser-based asynchronous (one-way) video interview platform that lets employers collect recorded video, audio, multiple-choice and written candidate responses, then uses AI to transcribe, summarize, rank candidates against employer-defined "Blueprint" criteria, and flag scripted or AI-generated answers.
Vendor profile
Workday Recruiting AI
AI features built into Workday Recruiting, including candidate-skill matching and recruiter productivity tools, surfaced inside the Workday ATS.
§ The record
Willo is filed under Video interview AI, Workday Recruiting AI under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only Willo is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Willo | Workday Recruiting AI |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Low | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | GB | US |
| Founded | 2018 | 2005 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 43% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Willo 38 · Workday Recruiting AI 70
6.4 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
18% weight · 79% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Willo 30 · Workday Recruiting AI 60
5.4 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
15% weight · 89% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Willo 25 · Workday Recruiting AI 35
1.5 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
8% weight · 95% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Willo 54 · Workday Recruiting AI 65
0.9 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
12% weight · 97% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Willo 62 · Workday Recruiting AI 65
0.4 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
15% weight · 99% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Willo 53 · Workday Recruiting AI 55
0.3 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Willo 36 · Workday Recruiting AI 35
0.1 weighted points to Willo
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -14.7 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 15.0 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -15 beside that -14.7.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Willo minus Workday Recruiting AI.
| Category | Weight | Willo | Workday Recruiting AI | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 38 | 70 | -32 | -6.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 30 | 60 | -30 | -5.4 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 35 | -10 | -1.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 53 | 55 | -2 | -0.3 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 62 | 65 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 36 | 35 | +1 | +0.1 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 54 | 65 | -11 | -0.9 |
| Total | 100% | 41 (F) | 56 (F) | -15 | -14.7 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Willo | Workday Recruiting AI | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 0 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 9 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 9 | 2 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
Willo has 14 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Workday Recruiting AI has 11 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 2 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 25 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 14 for Willo, across 1 distinct source domain, and 11 for Workday Recruiting AI, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Willo last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Workday Recruiting AI last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.