Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
365Talents vs Cangrade
365Talents
365Talents is an AI skills-intelligence and internal talent-marketplace platform that infers employees' skills from HRIS records, CVs, documents and collaboration tools, then matches them to internal jobs, projects, gigs, mentors, learning and succession pipelines.
Substantial gaps
Sourcing
Cangrade
Cangrade is a predictive pre-hire assessment and screening platform that scores candidates against customer-specific success models built from roughly 50 psychometric traits, with add-on modules for resume screening, structured and video interviews, interview scheduling, and reference checking.
Substantial gaps
Assessment
The result
1 point separates 365Talents and Cangrade.
365Talents holds a 1-point edge over Cangrade under rubric v1.0, 46 to 45, across the Sourcing and Assessment cohorts. The 7 criteria split 5 to 2 in favour of 365Talents: 365Talents is ahead on Article 11 Technical Documentation and Cangrade on Bias Audit Transparency. Bias Audit Transparency is at once the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing, and it belongs to Cangrade — 365Talents 18, Cangrade 35, on an 18% weight — which is 88% of the weighted advantage Cangrade holds across the 2 criteria on that side of the table.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- 365Talents5
- Cangrade2
- Widest raw gap
- Bias Audit Transparency18 vs 35
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Bias Audit Transparency18% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
365Talents is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Cangrade under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
| Record | 365Talents | Cangrade |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | FR | US |
| Founded | 2015 | 2014 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight36% of the movement so far
365Talents18Cangrade353.1 weighted points to Cangrade
- 2
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight61% of the movement so far
365Talents63Cangrade522.2 weighted points to 365Talents
- 3
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight78% of the movement so far
365Talents44Cangrade321.4 weighted points to 365Talents
- 4
FRIA Support
15% weight87% of the movement so far
365Talents35Cangrade300.8 weighted points to 365Talents
- 5
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight94% of the movement so far
365Talents58Cangrade540.6 weighted points to 365Talents
- 6
Customer Documentation
8% weight99% of the movement so far
365Talents57Cangrade620.4 weighted points to Cangrade
- 7
Human Oversight Design
12% weight100% of the movement so far
365Talents57Cangrade560.1 weighted points to 365Talents
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +1.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 8.6 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +1 beside that +1.6.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is 365Talents minus Cangrade, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | 365Talents | Cangrade | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 63 | 52 | +11 | +2.2 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 18 | 35 | -17 | -3.1 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 30 | +5 | +0.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 58 | 54 | +4 | +0.6 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 57 | 56 | +1 | +0.1 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 44 | 32 | +12 | +1.4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 57 | 62 | -5 | -0.4 |
| Total | 100% | 46F | 45F | +1 | +1.6 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | 365Talents | Cangrade | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 5 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | — | 4 | 3 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 5 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 31 | 7 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 20 | 10 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
365Talents has 38 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 31 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Cangrade has 27 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 20 with a source URL, 10 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Cangrade sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 65 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 38 for 365Talents, across 3 distinct source domains, and 27 for Cangrade, across 3 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- 365Talents last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Cangrade last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.